Xymon Mailing List Archive search

New Hobbit server install validation

12 messages in this thread

list Rafal Roginela · Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:30:17 -0600 ·
Hi All,

 
I have a 4.2 install of Hobbit up and running and I am very happy with
it. It runs on an old Gateway workstation with a Celeron and 512MB and
performs stellar! CentOs 5 nothing fancy. I was going to move it to a
more recent piece of hardware a Dell OptiPlex 320, which at least it is
under warranty. I had the Idea of running it as a Xen VM on a Debian
host. Is this a bad idea? 

 
Clarification of purpose: I'm really not going to run anything else on
the Xen except for this one VM and maybe and I mean maybe a test xymon
VM directly replicated from the working production VM. This is to
provide me with a quick failover ability of copying the image (from
backup or if the HD is intact directly from there) to another Xen host
and BLAMO xymon is running within minutes.

 
Does this sound OK? Is there a better way to accomplish this? 

Thank you,

Rafal Roginela
Network Engineer

AmeriCash Loans, LLC

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in
error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any
unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this
e-mail is strictly forbidden.
list Josh Luthman · Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:35:08 -0500 ·
I don't see a problem with that, in fact I think it would be a wise idea.
Note that anything built on Centos may not work on Debian - I suggest
recompiling/installing it on Debian then copying your configuration.

Josh Luthman
Office: XXX-XXX-XXXX
Direct: XXX-XXX-XXXX
XXXX Wayne St
Suite XXXX
Troy, OH XXXXX

Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer


On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Rafal Roginela <
quoted from Rafal Roginela
user-744e62462615@xymon.invalid> wrote:
 Hi All,


I have a 4.2 install of Hobbit up and running and I am very happy with it.
It runs on an old Gateway workstation with a Celeron and 512MB and performs
stellar! CentOs 5 nothing fancy. I was going to move it to a more recent
piece of hardware a Dell OptiPlex 320, which at least it is under warranty.
I had the Idea of running it as a Xen VM on a Debian host. Is this a bad
idea?


Clarification of purpose: I'm really not going to run anything else on the
Xen except for this one VM and maybe and I mean maybe a test xymon VM
directly replicated from the working production VM. This is to provide me
with a quick failover ability of copying the image (from backup or if the HD
is intact directly from there) to another Xen host and BLAMO xymon is
running within minutes.


Does this sound OK? Is there a better way to accomplish this?

Thank you,

*Rafal Roginela**
*Network Engineer

*AmeriCash Loans, LLC*

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error)
please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any
unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this
e-mail is strictly forbidden.

list Rafal Roginela · Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:48:02 -0600 ·
Thank you Josh,

 
I was actually thinking of upgrading at that point too so re-compile and
all that would have to be done. 

 
I'm also thinking of documenting the process to make a install HowTo for
noobs like me. Because compiling is only half the story there is the
whole process of making users and setting the whole thing to start
automatically and all that; may seem like child's play to some but to me
I know it will take a bit especially since this will be my first foray
into Debian.

 
Thank You,

Rafal Roginela

Office (XXX) XXX-XXXX x109
Fax (XXX) XXX-XXXX
signature

 This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in
error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any
unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this
e-mail is strictly forbidden.


quoted from Josh Luthman
From: Josh Luthman [mailto:user-4c45a83f15cb@xymon.invalid] 
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 3:35 PM
To: user-ae9b8668bcde@xymon.invalid
Subject: Re: [hobbit] New Hobbit server install validation

 
I don't see a problem with that, in fact I think it would be a wise
idea.  Note that anything built on Centos may not work on Debian - I
suggest recompiling/installing it on Debian then copying your
configuration.

Josh Luthman
Office: XXX-XXX-XXXX
Direct: XXX-XXX-XXXX
XXXX Wayne St
Suite XXXX
Troy, OH XXXXX

Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer


On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Rafal Roginela
<user-744e62462615@xymon.invalid> wrote:

Hi All,

 
I have a 4.2 install of Hobbit up and running and I am very happy with
it. It runs on an old Gateway workstation with a Celeron and 512MB and
performs stellar! CentOs 5 nothing fancy. I was going to move it to a
more recent piece of hardware a Dell OptiPlex 320, which at least it is
under warranty. I had the Idea of running it as a Xen VM on a Debian
host. Is this a bad idea? 

 
Clarification of purpose: I'm really not going to run anything else on
the Xen except for this one VM and maybe and I mean maybe a test xymon
VM directly replicated from the working production VM. This is to
provide me with a quick failover ability of copying the image (from
backup or if the HD is intact directly from there) to another Xen host
and BLAMO xymon is running within minutes.

 
Does this sound OK? Is there a better way to accomplish this? 

Thank you,

Rafal Roginela
Network Engineer

AmeriCash Loans, LLC

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in
error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any
unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this
e-mail is strictly forbidden.
list Josh Luthman · Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:57:08 -0500 ·
Like this?

http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/System_Monitoring_with_Hobbit/Administration_Guide/Compiling_on_CentOS
quoted from Rafal Roginela

Josh Luthman
Office: XXX-XXX-XXXX
Direct: XXX-XXX-XXXX
XXXX Wayne St
Suite XXXX
Troy, OH XXXXX

Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer


On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Rafal Roginela <
quoted from Rafal Roginela
user-744e62462615@xymon.invalid> wrote:
 Thank you Josh,


I was actually thinking of upgrading at that point too so re-compile and
all that would have to be done.


I'm also thinking of documenting the process to make a install HowTo for
noobs like me. Because compiling is only half the story there is the whole
process of making users and setting the whole thing to start automatically
and all that; may seem like child's play to some but to me I know it will
take a bit especially since this will be my first foray into Debian.


Thank You,

*Rafal Roginela*

Office (XXX) XXX-XXXX x109
Fax (XXX) XXX-XXXX

 This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error)
please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any
unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this
e-mail is strictly forbidden.

*From:* Josh Luthman [mailto:user-4c45a83f15cb@xymon.invalid]
*Sent:* Friday, February 20, 2009 3:35 PM
*To:* user-ae9b8668bcde@xymon.invalid
*Subject:* Re: [hobbit] New Hobbit server install validation


I don't see a problem with that, in fact I think it would be a wise idea.
Note that anything built on Centos may not work on Debian - I suggest
recompiling/installing it on Debian then copying your configuration.

Josh Luthman
Office: XXX-XXX-XXXX
Direct: XXX-XXX-XXXX
XXXX Wayne St
Suite XXXX
Troy, OH XXXXX

Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer

 On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Rafal Roginela <
user-744e62462615@xymon.invalid> wrote:

Hi All,


I have a 4.2 install of Hobbit up and running and I am very happy with it.
It runs on an old Gateway workstation with a Celeron and 512MB and performs
stellar! CentOs 5 nothing fancy. I was going to move it to a more recent
piece of hardware a Dell OptiPlex 320, which at least it is under warranty.
I had the Idea of running it as a Xen VM on a Debian host. Is this a bad
idea?


Clarification of purpose: I'm really not going to run anything else on the
Xen except for this one VM and maybe and I mean maybe a test xymon VM
directly replicated from the working production VM. This is to provide me
with a quick failover ability of copying the image (from backup or if the HD
is intact directly from there) to another Xen host and BLAMO xymon is
running within minutes.


Does this sound OK? Is there a better way to accomplish this?

Thank you,

*Rafal Roginela
*Network Engineer

*AmeriCash Loans, LLC*

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error)
please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any
unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this
e-mail is strictly forbidden.

list Rafal Roginela · Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:12:18 -0600 ·
Hi Josh,

 
Yeah just what I was thinking. Never did see this when I googled when I
installed my box.. hmmm.. makes me doubt my googling powers :-) But just
like this to chronicle my install since I'm going to do the docs for
myself I want to share it.
quoted from Josh Luthman

 
Thank You,

Rafal Roginela

Office (XXX) XXX-XXXX x109
Fax (XXX) XXX-XXXX

 This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in
error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any
unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this
e-mail is strictly forbidden.


From: Josh Luthman [mailto:user-4c45a83f15cb@xymon.invalid] 
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 3:57 PM
To: user-ae9b8668bcde@xymon.invalid
Subject: Re: [hobbit] New Hobbit server install validation

 

Like this?

http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/System_Monitoring_with_Hobbit/Administratio
n_Guide/Compiling_on_CentOS
quoted from Josh Luthman

Josh Luthman
Office: XXX-XXX-XXXX
Direct: XXX-XXX-XXXX
XXXX Wayne St
Suite XXXX
Troy, OH XXXXX

Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer


On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Rafal Roginela
<user-744e62462615@xymon.invalid> wrote:

Thank you Josh,

 
I was actually thinking of upgrading at that point too so re-compile and
all that would have to be done. 

 
I'm also thinking of documenting the process to make a install HowTo for
noobs like me. Because compiling is only half the story there is the
whole process of making users and setting the whole thing to start
automatically and all that; may seem like child's play to some but to me
I know it will take a bit especially since this will be my first foray
into Debian.

 
Thank You,

Rafal Roginela

Office (XXX) XXX-XXXX x109
Fax (XXX) XXX-XXXX

 This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in
error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any
unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this
e-mail is strictly forbidden.


From: Josh Luthman [mailto:user-4c45a83f15cb@xymon.invalid] 
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 3:35 PM
To: user-ae9b8668bcde@xymon.invalid
Subject: Re: [hobbit] New Hobbit server install validation

 
I don't see a problem with that, in fact I think it would be a wise
idea.  Note that anything built on Centos may not work on Debian - I
suggest recompiling/installing it on Debian then copying your
configuration.

Josh Luthman
Office: XXX-XXX-XXXX
Direct: XXX-XXX-XXXX
XXXX Wayne St
Suite XXXX
Troy, OH XXXXX

Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Rafal Roginela
<user-744e62462615@xymon.invalid> wrote:

Hi All,

 
I have a 4.2 install of Hobbit up and running and I am very happy with
it. It runs on an old Gateway workstation with a Celeron and 512MB and
performs stellar! CentOs 5 nothing fancy. I was going to move it to a
more recent piece of hardware a Dell OptiPlex 320, which at least it is
under warranty. I had the Idea of running it as a Xen VM on a Debian
host. Is this a bad idea? 

 
Clarification of purpose: I'm really not going to run anything else on
the Xen except for this one VM and maybe and I mean maybe a test xymon
VM directly replicated from the working production VM. This is to
provide me with a quick failover ability of copying the image (from
backup or if the HD is intact directly from there) to another Xen host
and BLAMO xymon is running within minutes.

 
Does this sound OK? Is there a better way to accomplish this? 

Thank you,

Rafal Roginela
Network Engineer

AmeriCash Loans, LLC

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in
error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any
unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this
e-mail is strictly forbidden.
list Henrik Størner · Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:45:53 +0100 ·
quoted from Rafal Roginela
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 03:30:17PM -0600, Rafal Roginela wrote:
I have a 4.2 install of Hobbit up and running and I am very happy with
it. It runs on an old Gateway workstation with a Celeron and 512MB and
performs stellar! CentOs 5 nothing fancy. I was going to move it to a
more recent piece of hardware a Dell OptiPlex 320, which at least it is
under warranty. I had the Idea of running it as a Xen VM on a Debian
host. Is this a bad idea? 
The only problem I've seen with Hobbit running in a VM is that the
virtual machines - at least with VMware - sometimes have problems 
maintaining their system clock in sync with the real world. The
clock tends to drift somewhat.

Since lots of stuff in Xymon (Hobbit) is timing dependant, this
can be a problem. The 4.2.0 and 4.2.2 versions in particular would
not handle a system clock going backwards very well - 4.2.3 is
better, and it should be all cured with 4.3.0, at least so that
Xymon doesn't crash if that happens. But it will still affect the
timestamps that appear on all of the log entries Xymon makes.


Regards,
Henrik
list Rich Smrcina · Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:11:50 -0600 ·
What's really weird is that one Xymon server that I run on VMWare Server on X86 has a 
clock that actually gains time!  Bizarre.
quoted from Henrik Størner

Henrik Størner wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 03:30:17PM -0600, Rafal Roginela wrote:
I have a 4.2 install of Hobbit up and running and I am very happy with
it. It runs on an old Gateway workstation with a Celeron and 512MB and
performs stellar! CentOs 5 nothing fancy. I was going to move it to a
more recent piece of hardware a Dell OptiPlex 320, which at least it is
under warranty. I had the Idea of running it as a Xen VM on a Debian
host. Is this a bad idea? 
The only problem I've seen with Hobbit running in a VM is that the
virtual machines - at least with VMware - sometimes have problems 
maintaining their system clock in sync with the real world. The
clock tends to drift somewhat.

Since lots of stuff in Xymon (Hobbit) is timing dependant, this
can be a problem. The 4.2.0 and 4.2.2 versions in particular would
not handle a system clock going backwards very well - 4.2.3 is
better, and it should be all cured with 4.3.0, at least so that
Xymon doesn't crash if that happens. But it will still affect the
timestamps that appear on all of the log entries Xymon makes.


Regards,
Henrik
-- 

Rich Smrcina
VM Assist, Inc.
Phone: XXX-XXX-XXXX
Ans Service:  XXX-XXX-XXXX
http://www.linkedin.com/in/richsmrcina

Catch the WAVV!  http://www.wavv.org
WAVV 2009 - Orlando, FL - May 15-19, 2009
list dOCtoR MADneSs · Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:06:34 +0100 ·
quoted from Rich Smrcina
Rich Smrcina a écrit :
What's really weird is that one Xymon server that I run on VMWare Server 
on X86 has a clock that actually gains time!  Bizarre.

Henrik Størner wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 03:30:17PM -0600, Rafal Roginela wrote:
I have a 4.2 install of Hobbit up and running and I am very happy with
it. It runs on an old Gateway workstation with a Celeron and 512MB and
performs stellar! CentOs 5 nothing fancy. I was going to move it to a
more recent piece of hardware a Dell OptiPlex 320, which at least it is
under warranty. I had the Idea of running it as a Xen VM on a Debian
host. Is this a bad idea? 
The only problem I've seen with Hobbit running in a VM is that the
virtual machines - at least with VMware - sometimes have problems 
maintaining their system clock in sync with the real world. The
clock tends to drift somewhat.

Since lots of stuff in Xymon (Hobbit) is timing dependant, this
can be a problem. The 4.2.0 and 4.2.2 versions in particular would
not handle a system clock going backwards very well - 4.2.3 is
better, and it should be all cured with 4.3.0, at least so that
Xymon doesn't crash if that happens. But it will still affect the
timestamps that appear on all of the log entries Xymon makes.


Regards,
Henrik
What VM software do you use ?
I often seen VMWare guests having troubles with clock management. The 
issue was solved with a kernel parameter (didn't remember wich one).
list Rich Smrcina · Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:36:19 -0600 ·
quoted from dOCtoR MADneSs
dOCtoR MADneSs wrote:
What VM software do you use ?
I often seen VMWare guests having troubles with clock management. The 
issue was solved with a kernel parameter (didn't remember wich one).

VMWare Server 1.0.5.  I haven't tried Version 2 on this machine yet.
quoted from Rich Smrcina

-- 
Rich Smrcina
VM Assist, Inc.
Phone: XXX-XXX-XXXX
Ans Service:  XXX-XXX-XXXX
http://www.linkedin.com/in/richsmrcina

Catch the WAVV!  http://www.wavv.org
WAVV 2009 - Orlando, FL - May 15-19, 2009
list dOCtoR MADneSs · Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:56:45 +0100 ·
quoted from Rich Smrcina
Rich Smrcina a écrit :
dOCtoR MADneSs wrote:
What VM software do you use ?
I often seen VMWare guests having troubles with clock management. The issue was solved with a kernel parameter (didn't remember wich one).

VMWare Server 1.0.5.  I haven't tried Version 2 on this machine yet.
You could find the kernel parameter to use on your vmware guests (if they are running linux of course), It was clock=pit
you could find more infos here :
http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalId=1420 (or use google cache, because i've blank page without it). google :
vmware linux clock
1st reply
list Rich Smrcina · Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:59:30 -0600 ·
quoted from dOCtoR MADneSs
dOCtoR MADneSs wrote:
You could find the kernel parameter to use on your vmware guests (if they are running linux of course), It was clock=pit
you could find more infos here :
http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalId=1420 (or use google cache, because i've blank page without it). google :
vmware linux clock
1st reply

Cool, thanks doc!
quoted from Rich Smrcina

-- 
Rich Smrcina
VM Assist, Inc.
Phone: XXX-XXX-XXXX
Ans Service:  XXX-XXX-XXXX
http://www.linkedin.com/in/richsmrcina

Catch the WAVV!  http://www.wavv.org
WAVV 2009 - Orlando, FL - May 15-19, 2009
list Benedikt Kristinsson · Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:59:07 +0000 ·
quoted from Henrik Størner
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 10:45 +0100, Henrik Størner wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 03:30:17PM -0600, Rafal Roginela wrote:
I have a 4.2 install of Hobbit up and running and I am very happy with
it. It runs on an old Gateway workstation with a Celeron and 512MB and
performs stellar! CentOs 5 nothing fancy. I was going to move it to a
more recent piece of hardware a Dell OptiPlex 320, which at least it is
under warranty. I had the Idea of running it as a Xen VM on a Debian
host. Is this a bad idea? 
The only problem I've seen with Hobbit running in a VM is that the
virtual machines - at least with VMware - sometimes have problems 
maintaining their system clock in sync with the real world. The
clock tends to drift somewhat.

Since lots of stuff in Xymon (Hobbit) is timing dependant, this
can be a problem. The 4.2.0 and 4.2.2 versions in particular would
not handle a system clock going backwards very well - 4.2.3 is
better, and it should be all cured with 4.3.0, at least so that
Xymon doesn't crash if that happens. But it will still affect the
timestamps that appear on all of the log entries Xymon makes.


Regards,
Henrik
I am running hobbit on a VMWare VM and I have only noticed slight
drifting of the clock. I just ntpd on both the Vmware host and the
hobbit vm and it seems to keep the clock in check.

Regards,
Benedikt