email acks
list Paul Root
I recently implemented acknowledgements via email. Today we notice that the ack is by postmaster. I'm not thrilled by that. Did I set something up wrong? Is there a way to get the actual email address of the ack'er in the acknowledgement? Paul Root - Senior Engineer Managed Services Systems - CenturyLink This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments.
list Josh Luthman
Not certain, but I think if you do a different alert it will send a different ack code per email address (fuzzy on the details, it's been some time since I read that). HOST=*.com MAIL user-d88bf83ec1e3@xymon.invalid MAIL user-149272e9d6fd@xymon.invalid So user1 gets one code and user2 gets another, depending on the ack code is who ack'ed it. Josh Luthman Office: XXX-XXX-XXXX Direct: XXX-XXX-XXXX XXXX Wayne St Suite XXXX Troy, OH XXXXX
▸
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Root, Paul <user-76fdb6883669@xymon.invalid> wrote:I recently implemented acknowledgements via email. Today we notice that the ack is by postmaster. I'm not thrilled by that. Did I set something up wrong? Is there a way to get the actual email address of the ack'er in the acknowledgement? Paul Root - Senior Engineer Managed Services Systems - CenturyLink This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments.
list Johan Sjöberg
We are using one MAIL line for all staff (group address) and the mail acks show up with the correct e-mail address in the ack history. So you shouldn't need to have one line for each recipient. Maybe there is something wrong in the logic that hands the mail over to the mailack command? /Johan
-----Original Message----- From: xymon-bounces at xymon.com [mailto:xymon-bounces at xymon.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: den 24 maj 2012 15:53 To: Root, Paul Cc: xymon at xymon.com Subject: Re: [Xymon] email acks
▸
Not certain, but I think if you do a different alert it will send a different ack code per email address (fuzzy on the details, it's been some time since I read that). HOST=*.com MAIL user-d88bf83ec1e3@xymon.invalid MAIL user-149272e9d6fd@xymon.invalid So user1 gets one code and user2 gets another, depending on the ack code is who ack'ed it. Josh Luthman Office: XXX-XXX-XXXX Direct: XXX-XXX-XXXX XXXX Wayne St Suite XXXX Troy, OH XXXXX On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Root, Paul <user-76fdb6883669@xymon.invalid> wrote:I recently implemented acknowledgements via email. Today we notice that the ack is by postmaster. I'm not thrilled by that. Did I set something up wrong? Is there a way to get the actual email address of the ack'er in the acknowledgement? Paul Root - Senior Engineer Managed Services Systems - CenturyLink This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments.
list Paul Root
We found our problem. One of our engineers mailbox filled up, and Exchange is sending a non-deliverable message back. We made a quick edit of the promailrc file and drop those messages, and out of office messages. And while we were at it, we made a file of allowed ackers and made that a rule. Should have done that from the start. Paul.
▸
Paul Root - Senior Engineer
Managed Services Systems - CenturyLink
-----Original Message----- From: xymon-bounces at xymon.com [mailto:xymon-bounces at xymon.com] On
Behalf Of Johan Sjöberg
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 9:20 AM
To: 'xymon at xymon.com'
▸
Subject: Re: [Xymon] email acks We are using one MAIL line for all staff (group address) and the mail acks show up with the correct e-mail address in the ack history. So you shouldn't need to have one line for each recipient. Maybe there is something wrong in the logic that hands the mail over to the mailack command? /Johan-----Original Message----- From: xymon-bounces at xymon.com [mailto:xymon-bounces at xymon.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: den 24 maj 2012 15:53 To: Root, Paul Cc: xymon at xymon.com Subject: Re: [Xymon] email acks Not certain, but I think if you do a different alert it will send a different ack code per email address (fuzzy on the details, it's been some time since I read that). HOST=*.com MAIL user-d88bf83ec1e3@xymon.invalid MAIL user-149272e9d6fd@xymon.invalid So user1 gets one code and user2 gets another, depending on the ack code is who ack'ed it. Josh Luthman Office: XXX-XXX-XXXX Direct: XXX-XXX-XXXX XXXX Wayne St Suite XXXX Troy, OH XXXXX On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Root, Paul<user-76fdb6883669@xymon.invalid>wrote:I recently implemented acknowledgements via email. Today we notice that the ack is by postmaster. I'm not thrilled by that. Did I set something up wrong? Is there a way to get the actual email address of the ack'er in the acknowledgement? Paul Root - Senior Engineer Managed Services Systems - CenturyLink This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments.
This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments.
list Josh Luthman
Thanks for the clarification you two!
▸
Josh Luthman
Office: XXX-XXX-XXXX
Direct: XXX-XXX-XXXX
XXXX Wayne St
Suite XXXX
Troy, OH XXXXX
▸
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Root, Paul <user-76fdb6883669@xymon.invalid> wrote:We found our problem. One of our engineers mailbox filled up, and Exchange is sending a non-deliverable message back. We made a quick edit of the promailrc file and drop those messages, and out of office messages. And while we were at it, we made a file of allowed ackers and made that a rule. Should have done that from the start. Paul. Paul Root - Senior Engineer Managed Services Systems - CenturyLink-----Original Message----- From: xymon-bounces at xymon.com [mailto:xymon-bounces at xymon.com] On Behalf Of Johan Sjöberg Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 9:20 AM To: 'xymon at xymon.com' Subject: Re: [Xymon] email acks We are using one MAIL line for all staff (group address) and the mail acks show up with the correct e-mail address in the ack history. So you shouldn't need to have one line for each recipient. Maybe there is something wrong in the logic that hands the mail over to the mailack command? /Johan-----Original Message----- From: xymon-bounces at xymon.com [mailto:xymon-bounces at xymon.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: den 24 maj 2012 15:53 To: Root, Paul Cc: xymon at xymon.com Subject: Re: [Xymon] email acks Not certain, but I think if you do a different alert it will send a different ack code per email address (fuzzy on the details, it's been some time since I read that). HOST=*.com MAIL user-d88bf83ec1e3@xymon.invalid MAIL user-149272e9d6fd@xymon.invalid So user1 gets one code and user2 gets another, depending on the ack code is who ack'ed it. Josh Luthman Office: XXX-XXX-XXXX Direct: XXX-XXX-XXXX XXXX Wayne St Suite XXXX Troy, OH XXXXX On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Root, Paul<user-76fdb6883669@xymon.invalid>wrote:I recently implemented acknowledgements via email. Today we notice that the ack is by postmaster. I'm not thrilled by that. Did I set something up wrong? Is there a way to get the actual email address of the ack'er in the acknowledgement? Paul Root - Senior Engineer Managed Services Systems - CenturyLink This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments.This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments.