Xymon Mailing List Archive search

test of pultiple ports for same service on same host

5 messages in this thread

list Christian · Wed, 02 Apr 2014 14:25:06 +0200 ·
Hello! 

I would like to monitor the same TCP service, on the same host, but
running on 2 different ports. In fact, I run an MX server and it should be
opened on port 25 (of course), and also on port 587 (for local network
authenticated submissions).

So I would like to monitor, on the same host, SMTP on port 25 and on port
587.

If I write "0.0.0.0 myhost # smtp smtp:587" in "bb-hosts", it does not
work and only the last directive ("smtp:587") is taken into account.

What should I do? Create a new service in file "bb-services" called maybe
"smtp-submission", cloning the "smtp" one and adding the 587 port? Or does
somebody have another solution in mind?

Thanks.

-- 
Christian
list John Thurston · Wed, 02 Apr 2014 08:11:46 -0800 ·
quoted from Christian
On 4/2/2014 4:25 AM, Christian wrote:
Hello!

I would like to monitor the same TCP service, on the same host, but
running on 2 different ports. In fact, I run an MX server and it should be
opened on port 25 (of course), and also on port 587 (for local network
authenticated submissions).

So I would like to monitor, on the same host, SMTP on port 25 and on port
587.

If I write "0.0.0.0 myhost # smtp smtp:587" in "bb-hosts", it does not
work and only the last directive ("smtp:587") is taken into account.

What should I do? Create a new service in file "bb-services" called maybe
"smtp-submission", cloning the "smtp" one and adding the 587 port? Or does
somebody have another solution in mind?
I create an alias to the test name in protocols.cfg like this:
   [ftp]  ==>  [ftp|ftp1|ftp2|ftp3]

Then I can use a line in hosts.cfg like this:
   0.0.0.0  foo.bar.com  # ftp ftp1:2211 ftp2:2212

This reuses all/any of the ftp send/response strings in protocols.cfg 
which is nicer than copy/paste the whole section. The problem with this 
approach is updates to the Xymon application will repair protocols.cfg 
by keeping my modified definition _and_ reinserting the original.

-- 
    Do things because you should, not just because you can.

John Thurston    XXX-XXX-XXXX
user-ce4d79d99bab@xymon.invalid
Enterprise Technology Services
Department of Administration
State of Alaska
list Jeremy Laidman · Sat, 5 Apr 2014 01:15:22 +1100 ·
quoted from John Thurston
On 3 April 2014 03:11, John Thurston <user-ce4d79d99bab@xymon.invalid> wrote:
This reuses all/any of the ftp send/response strings in protocols.cfg
which is nicer than copy/paste the whole section. The problem with this
approach is updates to the Xymon application will repair protocols.cfg by
keeping my modified definition _and_ reinserting the original.

You can use the "include" keyword for protocols.cfg.  So you could append
"include protocols-local.cfg" at the end of protocols.cfg, and then put
your re-definition into that file.  Upgrades should leave your own version
alone, and you only need to re-insert the include line to get it working
again.  If it's anything like the graphs.cfg file, later definitions (such
as in files included at the end) will replace earlier definitions.

J
list John Thurston · Fri, 04 Apr 2014 07:04:58 -0800 ·
quoted from Jeremy Laidman
On 4/4/2014 6:15 AM, Jeremy Laidman wrote:
On 3 April 2014 03:11, John Thurston <user-ce4d79d99bab@xymon.invalid> wrote:
This reuses all/any of the ftp send/response strings in protocols.cfg
which is nicer than copy/paste the whole section. The problem with this
approach is updates to the Xymon application will repair protocols.cfg by
keeping my modified definition _and_ reinserting the original.

You can use the "include" keyword for protocols.cfg.  So you could append
"include protocols-local.cfg" at the end of protocols.cfg, and then put
your re-definition into that file.
A couple of months ago, I dug through the documentation seeking just 
such an option. Your suggestion was enough to have me try it even 
without finding it in the doc. I didn't confirm the 'include' keyword 
worked because I really wanted the 'directory' function.

a'yep. It does.

I've appended:
    directory /opt/xymon/server/etc/protocols.d
to server/etc/protocols.cfg and it happily consumes the files I put in 
that directory.
quoted from Jeremy Laidman
Upgrades should leave your own version
alone, and you only need to re-insert the include line to get it working
again.  If it's anything like the graphs.cfg file, later definitions (such
as in files included at the end) will replace earlier definitions.
Shucks. I didn't know it would work with graphs.cfg, too. I'm off to try 
the same thing there. Thank you, Jeremy!
quoted from John Thurston
-- 
    Do things because you should, not just because you can.

John Thurston    XXX-XXX-XXXX
user-ce4d79d99bab@xymon.invalid
Enterprise Technology Services
Department of Administration
State of Alaska
list Japheth Cleaver · Fri, 4 Apr 2014 08:40:36 -0700 ·
quoted from John Thurston
On Fri, April 4, 2014 8:04 am, John Thurston wrote:
On 4/4/2014 6:15 AM, Jeremy Laidman wrote:
On 3 April 2014 03:11, John Thurston <user-ce4d79d99bab@xymon.invalid> wrote:
This reuses all/any of the ftp send/response strings in protocols.cfg
which is nicer than copy/paste the whole section. The problem with this
approach is updates to the Xymon application will repair protocols.cfg
by
keeping my modified definition _and_ reinserting the original.

You can use the "include" keyword for protocols.cfg.  So you could
append
"include protocols-local.cfg" at the end of protocols.cfg, and then put
your re-definition into that file.
A couple of months ago, I dug through the documentation seeking just
such an option. Your suggestion was enough to have me try it even
without finding it in the doc. I didn't confirm the 'include' keyword
worked because I really wanted the 'directory' function.

a'yep. It does.

I've appended:
    directory /opt/xymon/server/etc/protocols.d
to server/etc/protocols.cfg and it happily consumes the files I put in
that directory.
Shucks. I didn't know it would work with graphs.cfg, too. I'm off to try
the same thing there. Thank you, Jeremy!
--

The include and directory directives should work on anything opened using
the file stack routines, which is pretty much most files except the
cgioptions.cfg shell include.


HTH,
-jc