Xymon Mailing List Archive search

Upgrading from 4.3.5 to 4.3.7 - need additional patches?

3 messages in this thread

list Carl Melgaard · Wed, 7 Mar 2012 08:59:16 +0100 ·
Hi,

To get the most "patched" current version, should I get the stable 4.3.7 or the current trunk from SF? And is there any additional patches I need apply?

Regards,
Carl Melgaard
list Japheth Cleaver · Wed, 7 Mar 2012 13:51:27 -0800 (PST) ·
quoted from Carl Melgaard
On Tue, March 6, 2012 11:59 pm, Carl Melgaard wrote:
Hi,

To get the most "patched" current version, should I get the stable 4.3.7
or the current trunk from SF? And is there any additional patches I need
apply?

Regards,
Carl Melgaard

Stable 4.3.7 is certainly current. There are a lot of changes in trunk
(ipv6 stuff, etc); I don't know that it's in a compilable state at the
moment.

There are a few patches to 4.3.7 that have been posted to the list, but
nothing absolutely necessary IIRC unless you're affected by that bug.


Regards,

-jc
list Carl Melgaard · Thu, 8 Mar 2012 10:10:06 +0100 ·
Hi,

Would getting the branches/4.3.7 give me a version with relevant patches and without the ipv6 stuff? Or would I have to get the stable 4.3.7 and put the dispinclude patches (6899 revs) and the likes on afterwards?

Regards,
Carl Melgaard
quoted from Japheth Cleaver
 
-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: user-87556346d4af@xymon.invalid [mailto:user-87556346d4af@xymon.invalid] 
Sendt: 7. marts 2012 22:51
Til: Carl Melgaard
Cc: 'xymon at xymon.com'
Emne: Re: [Xymon] Upgrading from 4.3.5 to 4.3.7 - need additional patches?

On Tue, March 6, 2012 11:59 pm, Carl Melgaard wrote:
Hi,

To get the most "patched" current version, should I get the stable 4.3.7
or the current trunk from SF? And is there any additional patches I need
apply?

Regards,
Carl Melgaard

Stable 4.3.7 is certainly current. There are a lot of changes in trunk
(ipv6 stuff, etc); I don't know that it's in a compilable state at the
moment.

There are a few patches to 4.3.7 that have been posted to the list, but
nothing absolutely necessary IIRC unless you're affected by that bug.


Regards,

-jc