Tutorial - Wiki 🔗 link

On Friday 13 April 2007, Don Munyak wrote:

Hello All,

In searching the list, I turned up very little in terms of tutorial's.
I did see the wikibooks has something
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/System_Monitoring_with_Hobbit/

Does anyone has a tutorials they'd like to share?

Are there any other wiki's available to grow the KB?

-----Original Message-----
From: Stef Coene [mailto:user-dbffe946c0f4@xymon.invalid]
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 2:35 PM
To: user-ae9b8668bcde@xymon.invalid
Subject: Re: [hobbit] Tutorial - Wiki

On Friday 13 April 2007, Don Munyak wrote:

Hello All,

In searching the list, I turned up very little in terms of
tutorial's.
I did see the wikibooks has something
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/System_Monitoring_with_Hobbit/

Does anyone has a tutorials they'd like to share?

Are there any other wiki's available to grow the KB?

I too like the idea of a wiki.  I started one for myself at
http://www.docum.org/twiki/bin/view/Hobbit/WebHome
I can host a hobbit wiki if people are willing to update it ;)

From: Stef Coene <user-dbffe946c0f4@xymon.invalid>
Reply-To: user-ae9b8668bcde@xymon.invalid
To: user-ae9b8668bcde@xymon.invalid
Subject: Re: [hobbit] Tutorial - Wiki
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 21:35:50 +0200

On Friday 13 April 2007, Alan Davis wrote:

http://www.trantor.org/theshire/

I have visited the shire before, but this is not what I need.  It's not
flexible enough.  I more like a wiki where anyone can change anything.

T.J. Yang wrote:

From: Stef Coene <user-dbffe946c0f4@xymon.invalid>
Reply-To: user-ae9b8668bcde@xymon.invalid
To: user-ae9b8668bcde@xymon.invalid
Subject: Re: [hobbit] Tutorial - Wiki
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 21:35:50 +0200

On Friday 13 April 2007, Alan Davis wrote:

http://www.trantor.org/theshire/

I have visited the shire before, but this is not what I need.  It's not
flexible enough.  I more like a wiki where anyone can change anything.

That is exactly the reason I started the wiki book on http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/System_Monitoring_with_Hobbit.

But the problem is most people expect others to do the documentation.
We have too few person with good documentation skills have time to contribute.
I(don't have good doc skill) can only contribute when it is related to my hb deployment at work.
Like R1 entry.

Another approach is to encourage an author to do the work professionally. I will buy one copy if someone can get hb book publish via Orielly

R1: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/System_Monitoring_with_Hobbit/HOWTO#Hobbit_Client_and_ZFS_monitoring 

Regards

tj

Stef

Can’t afford to quit your job? – Earn your AS, BS, or MS degree online in 1 year. http://www.classesusa.com/clickcount.cfm?id=866145&goto=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.classesusa.com%2Ffeaturedschools%2Fonlinedegreesmp%2Fform-dyn1.html%3Fsplovr%3D866143 

-- 

Stef Coene wrote:

On Friday 13 April 2007, Alan Davis wrote:
  

http://www.trantor.org/theshire/
    

I have visited the shire before, but this is not what I need.  It's not flexible enough.  I more like a wiki where anyone can change anything.


Stef
  

Stef Coene wrote:

On Friday 13 April 2007, Alan Davis wrote:

http://www.trantor.org/theshire/

I have visited the shire before, but this is not what I need.  It's not
flexible enough.  I more like a wiki where anyone can change anything.


Stef

On Friday 13 April 2007 16:23, Galen Johnson wrote:
It was a conscious decision to restrict the shire to ensure that the
content is consistent.  I'm more than willing to add additional content
(and have asked on several occasions) that is related to extending
hobbit functionality.  That said, the shire is more for maintaining the
external scripts available for Hobbit somewhat on the order of deadcat
for BB.  Deadcat has many scripts that do the same thing...by keeping it
more restricted, it was hoped to be able to avoid redundant scripts that
in many cases are less functional than existing ones.  I just happen to
be using a wiki as a CMS.

=G=

On Friday 13 April 2007 16:23, Galen Johnson wrote:
It was a conscious decision to restrict the shire to ensure that the
content is consistent.  I'm more than willing to add additional content
(and have asked on several occasions) that is related to extending
hobbit functionality.  That said, the shire is more for maintaining the
external scripts available for Hobbit somewhat on the order of deadcat
for BB.  Deadcat has many scripts that do the same thing...by keeping it
more restricted, it was hoped to be able to avoid redundant scripts that
in many cases are less functional than existing ones.  I just happen to
be using a wiki as a CMS.