Any idea on a 4.3.0 third beta (or rc?) timeframe? 🔗 link

On 06/21/2010 04:25 PM, Cleaver, Japheth wrote:

I know a lot of people seem to be using checked out svn versions, but
it would be nice if we could get another tarball release as well,
consider that the last one was quite a while ago.

I've noticed that the demo/prod site at http://www.hswn.dk/hobbit/
already self-identifies as Xymon 4.3.0-1.3; I'm a little curious what
the larger changes from 4.3.0-beta2 have been...

<user-6a0b8b0f0ae1@xymon.invalid> wrote:

On 06/21/2010 04:25 PM, Cleaver, Japheth wrote:

I know a lot of people seem to be using checked out svn versions, but
it would be nice if we could get another tarball release as well,
consider that the last one was quite a while ago.

I've noticed that the demo/prod site at http://www.hswn.dk/hobbit/
already self-identifies as Xymon 4.3.0-1.3; I'm a little curious what
the larger changes from 4.3.0-beta2 have been...

I've been wondering about this, and about the overall state of xymon
development in general.  Honestly, it looks pretty bleak to me.  I can't
shake my concerns that it will become an orphaned project, even with the
very active user community rallying around it.  Xymon is a solid, mature
product and has served us all well for years, but the snmp support and some
sprucing up of the web UI would make a world of difference to me and I'm
sure to other users as well.  I'd feel a lot better if I had a more clear
vision on where the project is going.

Tom

-- 

-----Original Message-----
From: TJ Yang [mailto:user-61afc885aa73@xymon.invalid] 
Sent: 24 June 2010 10:44 PM
To: user-ae9b8668bcde@xymon.invalid
Subject: Re: [hobbit] Any idea on a 4.3.0 third beta (or rc?) timeframe?

I think the main (and only) xymon developer got wear out over the
years, last time I heard from the list from people seeing him far away
in same office of his existence status. Nothing bad happened to him,
"he need a break" is a reasonable statement.

So lets let him take a break. Otherwise someone need to read through
the source code tree and generate function architecture diagram in his
head and understand/test the patches from community with confidence it
won't make it worse. In fact should be more than one person need to
stand up and commit to become hobbit developers. So we won't have
Single point of failure in our Xymon development model.

Currently, there is no problem actually, no patches committed, no
roadmaps and that is all.  it still work and far better than other
free and commercial system monitoring solution.

I see many users stand up to support other new comers. this will take
off a lots of burden used provided by Henrik.

So the real question should be, "how many experienced users willing to
become developers ?"
We all know this a job that without pay, using your personal free time ... etc.


tj

On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Tom Georgoulias
<user-6a0b8b0f0ae1@xymon.invalid> wrote:

On 06/21/2010 04:25 PM, Cleaver, Japheth wrote:

I know a lot of people seem to be using checked out svn versions, but
it would be nice if we could get another tarball release as well,
consider that the last one was quite a while ago.

I've noticed that the demo/prod site at http://www.hswn.dk/hobbit/
already self-identifies as Xymon 4.3.0-1.3; I'm a little curious what
the larger changes from 4.3.0-beta2 have been...

I've been wondering about this, and about the overall state of xymon
development in general.  Honestly, it looks pretty bleak to me.  I can't
shake my concerns that it will become an orphaned project, even with the
very active user community rallying around it.  Xymon is a solid, mature
product and has served us all well for years, but the snmp support and some
sprucing up of the web UI would make a world of difference to me and I'm
sure to other users as well.  I'd feel a lot better if I had a more clear
vision on where the project is going.

Tom

-- 
T.J. Yang

On Friday, 25 June 2010 06:28:12 Neil Franken wrote:

Hi Guys

Like I mentioned in the mails before I would love to step up to the plate.
 Where do I sign up? I have some CSS/XHTML skills to spruce up the web
 interface. I also have some C/C++ skills. So I can have a go at the
 development. However like TJ mentioned we should really first get some
 kick arse documentation produced.

-----Original Message-----
From: Buchan Milne [mailto:user-9b139aff4dec@xymon.invalid] 
Sent: 28 June 2010 10:28 AM
To: user-ae9b8668bcde@xymon.invalid
Cc: Neil Franken
Subject: Re: [hobbit] Any idea on a 4.3.0 third beta (or rc?) timeframe?

On Friday, 25 June 2010 06:28:12 Neil Franken wrote:

Hi Guys

Like I mentioned in the mails before I would love to step up to the
plate.
 Where do I sign up? I have some CSS/XHTML skills to spruce up the web
 interface. I also have some C/C++ skills. So I can have a go at the
 development. However like TJ mentioned we should really first get
some
 kick arse documentation produced.

There is a developers list for the hobbitmon project on SF. A number of
people 
are subscribed, including people with commit access.

However, there is currently only one project admin for the SF project,
Henrik 
(which means no more committers can be added at present, and some
features 
that may assist in collaboration can't be enabled).

Anyway, I think we should move this discussion to the developer list,
and 
discuss a way forward there.

Regards,
Buchan

<user-1689acfc5a3b@xymon.invalid> wrote:

Agreed. I have a sf id will join the list as well.


-----Original Message-----
From: Buchan Milne [mailto:user-9b139aff4dec@xymon.invalid]
Sent: 28 June 2010 10:28 AM
To: user-ae9b8668bcde@xymon.invalid
Cc: Neil Franken
Subject: Re: [hobbit] Any idea on a 4.3.0 third beta (or rc?) timeframe?

On Friday, 25 June 2010 06:28:12 Neil Franken wrote:

Hi Guys

Like I mentioned in the mails before I would love to step up to the
plate.
 Where do I sign up? I have some CSS/XHTML skills to spruce up the web
 interface. I also have some C/C++ skills. So I can have a go at the
 development. However like TJ mentioned we should really first get
some
 kick arse documentation produced.

There is a developers list for the hobbitmon project on SF. A number of
people
are subscribed, including people with commit access.

However, there is currently only one project admin for the SF project,
Henrik
(which means no more committers can be added at present, and some
features
that may assist in collaboration can't be enabled).

Anyway, I think we should move this discussion to the developer list,
and
discuss a way forward there.

Regards,
Buchan

-- 

On 06/28/2010 04:28 AM, Buchan Milne wrote:

There is a developers list for the hobbitmon project on SF. A number of people
are subscribed, including people with commit access.

However, there is currently only one project admin for the SF project, Henrik
(which means no more committers can be added at present, and some features
that may assist in collaboration can't be enabled).

Anyway, I think we should move this discussion to the developer list, and
discuss a way forward there.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Georgoulias [mailto:user-6a0b8b0f0ae1@xymon.invalid] Sent: 29 June 2010 06:00 PM
To: user-ae9b8668bcde@xymon.invalid
Subject: Re: [hobbit] Any idea on a 4.3.0 third beta (or rc?) timeframe?

On 06/28/2010 04:28 AM, Buchan Milne wrote:

There is a developers list for the hobbitmon project on SF. A number
of people
are subscribed, including people with commit access.

However, there is currently only one project admin for the SF project,

Henrik

(which means no more committers can be added at present, and some
features
that may assist in collaboration can't be enabled).

Is Henrik still interested in being the single admin, or should he be contacted and asked if another person can be added in that role?  I recall postings where he described health issues and also a desire to stop working so much on xymon, and I don't fault him for wanting to take

a break.  However, it would be nice to know if he plans to work on the project again, or if he's done with it and wants to move onto other things.  I've been around open source long enough to know how the process works and I respect the developers who put time in on their projects.  Sure xymon works fine now, but if something changes in a distro one or more of us are using and it breaks xymon, we'll all have to make a choice on how to move forward.  It would be best for the community as a whole if we had an idea of where things stood and where they might go.

Anyway, I think we should move this discussion to the developer list,
and
discuss a way forward there.

I joined that list so that I can follow the discussion, but I do think this topic is of interest to members of this list, too.

Tom

In <user-015db105c324@xymon.invalid> Tom Georgoulias <user-6a0b8b0f0ae1@xymon.invalid> writes:

On 06/28/2010 04:28 AM, Buchan Milne wrote:

There is a developers list for the hobbitmon project on SF. A number of people
are subscribed, including people with commit access.

However, there is currently only one project admin for the SF project, Henrik
(which means no more committers can be added at present, and some features
that may assist in collaboration can't be enabled).

Is Henrik still interested in being the single admin, or should he be contacted and asked if another person can be added in that role?  I recall postings where he described health issues and also a desire to stop working so much on xymon, and I don't fault him for wanting to take a break.  However, it would be nice to know if he plans to work on the project again, or if he's done with it and wants to move onto other things.  I've been around open source long enough to know how the process works and I respect the developers who put time in on their projects.  Sure xymon works fine now, but if something changes in a distro one or more of us are using and it breaks xymon, we'll all have to make a choice on how to move forward.  It would be best for the community as a whole if we had an idea of where things stood and where they might go.

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Henrik Størner <user-ce4a2c883f75@xymon.invalid> wrote:

In <user-015db105c324@xymon.invalid> Tom Georgoulias <user-6a0b8b0f0ae1@xymon.invalid> writes:

On 06/28/2010 04:28 AM, Buchan Milne wrote:

There is a developers list for the hobbitmon project on SF. A number of people
are subscribed, including people with commit access.

However, there is currently only one project admin for the SF project, Henrik
(which means no more committers can be added at present, and some features
that may assist in collaboration can't be enabled).

Is Henrik still interested in being the single admin, or should he be
contacted and asked if another person can be added in that role?  I
recall postings where he described health issues and also a desire to
stop working so much on xymon, and I don't fault him for wanting to take
a break.  However, it would be nice to know if he plans to work on the
project again, or if he's done with it and wants to move onto other
things.  I've been around open source long enough to know how the
process works and I respect the developers who put time in on their
projects.  Sure xymon works fine now, but if something changes in a
distro one or more of us are using and it breaks xymon, we'll all have
to make a choice on how to move forward.  It would be best for the
community as a whole if we had an idea of where things stood and where
they might go.

Tom has pretty much hit the nail on the head here.

It's true that I have pretty much stopped working on Xymon development.
I am not quite sure why, but for some time it has just seemed to be
more of a tedious chore than something I would look forward to. I think
the task of getting all the documentation lined up for 4.3.0 (that is the
main outstanding issue for that release) just doesn't seem all that
appealing...

So I would really welcome someone who would be willing to take over the
project management / admin tasks. Even if it were just as a co-admin,
it would still be nice to have someone else with the enthusiasm that
is necessary to push the project forward.

For me, the ideal would be if I could focus on writing code instead of
running the project.

So if you have the ambition and energy of trying to run this project,
please speak up. Choosing a (co-)admin for Xymon is an important
decision, and one that definitely needs some community involvement.
All of you must feel comfortable with the person/persons we choose
for this task.

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 6:22 PM, TJ Yang <user-61afc885aa73@xymon.invalid> wrote:

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Henrik Størner <user-ce4a2c883f75@xymon.invalid> wrote:

In <user-015db105c324@xymon.invalid> Tom Georgoulias <
user-6a0b8b0f0ae1@xymon.invalid> writes:

On 06/28/2010 04:28 AM, Buchan Milne wrote:

There is a developers list for the hobbitmon project on SF. A number of
people
are subscribed, including people with commit access.

However, there is currently only one project admin for the SF project,

Henrik

(which means no more committers can be added at present, and some
features
that may assist in collaboration can't be enabled).

Is Henrik still interested in being the single admin, or should he be
contacted and asked if another person can be added in that role?  I
recall postings where he described health issues and also a desire to
stop working so much on xymon, and I don't fault him for wanting to take
a break.  However, it would be nice to know if he plans to work on the
project again, or if he's done with it and wants to move onto other
things.  I've been around open source long enough to know how the
process works and I respect the developers who put time in on their
projects.  Sure xymon works fine now, but if something changes in a
distro one or more of us are using and it breaks xymon, we'll all have
to make a choice on how to move forward.  It would be best for the
community as a whole if we had an idea of where things stood and where
they might go.

Tom has pretty much hit the nail on the head here.

It's true that I have pretty much stopped working on Xymon development.
I am not quite sure why, but for some time it has just seemed to be
more of a tedious chore than something I would look forward to. I think
the task of getting all the documentation lined up for 4.3.0 (that is the
main outstanding issue for that release) just doesn't seem all that
appealing...

So I would really welcome someone who would be willing to take over the
project management / admin tasks. Even if it were just as a co-admin,
it would still be nice to have someone else with the enthusiasm that
is necessary to push the project forward.

For me, the ideal would be if I could focus on writing code instead of
running the project.

So if you have the ambition and energy of trying to run this project,
please speak up. Choosing a (co-)admin for Xymon is an important
decision, and one that definitely needs some community involvement.
All of you must feel comfortable with the person/persons we choose
for this task.

I like to offer myself as co-admin candidate.
Let me know if all of you like to understand more about me.

Can we have more than 2 project admins ?

tj

Regards,
Henrik

--
T.J. Yang

 
From: Jerald Sheets [mailto:user-96a6f34c5806@xymon.invalid] 
Sent: 01 July 2010 05:58 AM
To: user-ae9b8668bcde@xymon.invalid
Subject: Re: [hobbit] Any idea on a 4.3.0 third beta (or rc?) timeframe?

 
I'm willing to help out in any way as well.  Just let me know what I can do to help out.

 
---
Jerald M. Sheets jr.


On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 6:22 PM, TJ Yang <user-61afc885aa73@xymon.invalid> wrote:

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Henrik Størner <user-ce4a2c883f75@xymon.invalid> wrote:

In <user-015db105c324@xymon.invalid> Tom Georgoulias <user-6a0b8b0f0ae1@xymon.invalid> writes:

On 06/28/2010 04:28 AM, Buchan Milne wrote:

There is a developers list for the hobbitmon project on SF. A number of people
are subscribed, including people with commit access.

However, there is currently only one project admin for the SF project, Henrik
(which means no more committers can be added at present, and some features
that may assist in collaboration can't be enabled).

Is Henrik still interested in being the single admin, or should he be
contacted and asked if another person can be added in that role?  I
recall postings where he described health issues and also a desire to
stop working so much on xymon, and I don't fault him for wanting to take
a break.  However, it would be nice to know if he plans to work on the
project again, or if he's done with it and wants to move onto other
things.  I've been around open source long enough to know how the
process works and I respect the developers who put time in on their
projects.  Sure xymon works fine now, but if something changes in a
distro one or more of us are using and it breaks xymon, we'll all have
to make a choice on how to move forward.  It would be best for the
community as a whole if we had an idea of where things stood and where
they might go.

Tom has pretty much hit the nail on the head here.

It's true that I have pretty much stopped working on Xymon development.
I am not quite sure why, but for some time it has just seemed to be
more of a tedious chore than something I would look forward to. I think
the task of getting all the documentation lined up for 4.3.0 (that is the
main outstanding issue for that release) just doesn't seem all that
appealing...

So I would really welcome someone who would be willing to take over the
project management / admin tasks. Even if it were just as a co-admin,
it would still be nice to have someone else with the enthusiasm that
is necessary to push the project forward.

For me, the ideal would be if I could focus on writing code instead of
running the project.

So if you have the ambition and energy of trying to run this project,
please speak up. Choosing a (co-)admin for Xymon is an important
decision, and one that definitely needs some community involvement.
All of you must feel comfortable with the person/persons we choose
for this task.

I like to offer myself as co-admin candidate.
Let me know if all of you like to understand more about me.

Can we have more than 2 project admins ?

tj

Regards,
Henrik

--
T.J. Yang

I like to offer myself as co-admin candidate.
Let me know if all of you like to understand more about me.

On Wed, 30 Jun 2010, TJ Yang wrote:

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Henrik Størner <user-ce4a2c883f75@xymon.invalid> wrote:

In <user-015db105c324@xymon.invalid> Tom Georgoulias <user-6a0b8b0f0ae1@xymon.invalid> writes:

On 06/28/2010 04:28 AM, Buchan Milne wrote:

There is a developers list for the hobbitmon project on SF. A number of people
are subscribed, including people with commit access.

However, there is currently only one project admin for the SF project, Henrik
(which means no more committers can be added at present, and some features
that may assist in collaboration can't be enabled).

Is Henrik still interested in being the single admin, or should he be
contacted and asked if another person can be added in that role?  I
recall postings where he described health issues and also a desire to
stop working so much on xymon, and I don't fault him for wanting to take
a break.  However, it would be nice to know if he plans to work on the
project again, or if he's done with it and wants to move onto other
things.  I've been around open source long enough to know how the
process works and I respect the developers who put time in on their
projects.  Sure xymon works fine now, but if something changes in a
distro one or more of us are using and it breaks xymon, we'll all have
to make a choice on how to move forward.  It would be best for the
community as a whole if we had an idea of where things stood and where
they might go.

Tom has pretty much hit the nail on the head here.

It's true that I have pretty much stopped working on Xymon development.
I am not quite sure why, but for some time it has just seemed to be
more of a tedious chore than something I would look forward to. I think
the task of getting all the documentation lined up for 4.3.0 (that is the
main outstanding issue for that release) just doesn't seem all that
appealing...

So I would really welcome someone who would be willing to take over the
project management / admin tasks. Even if it were just as a co-admin,
it would still be nice to have someone else with the enthusiasm that
is necessary to push the project forward.

For me, the ideal would be if I could focus on writing code instead of
running the project.

So if you have the ambition and energy of trying to run this project,
please speak up. Choosing a (co-)admin for Xymon is an important
decision, and one that definitely needs some community involvement.
All of you must feel comfortable with the person/persons we choose
for this task.

I like to offer myself as co-admin candidate.
Let me know if all of you like to understand more about me.

Can we have more than 2 project admins ?

tj

Regards,
Henrik

-- 
T.J. Yang

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Flemming [mailto:user-f286aaa49a76@xymon.invalid] 
Sent: 01 July 2010 06:54
To: user-ae9b8668bcde@xymon.invalid
Subject: Re: [hobbit] Any idea on a 4.3.0 third beta (or rc?) timeframe?

I like to offer myself as co-admin candidate.
Let me know if all of you like to understand more about me.

My vote, you've got :-)

Can we have more than 2 project admins ?

tj

Didn't really know, how such project to get best work,
but why not ...

martin


On Wed, 30 Jun 2010, TJ Yang wrote:

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Henrik Størner <user-ce4a2c883f75@xymon.invalid> wrote:

In <user-015db105c324@xymon.invalid> Tom Georgoulias <user-6a0b8b0f0ae1@xymon.invalid> writes:

On 06/28/2010 04:28 AM, Buchan Milne wrote:

There is a developers list for the hobbitmon project on SF. A number of people
are subscribed, including people with commit access.

However, there is currently only one project admin for the SF project, Henrik
(which means no more committers can be added at present, and some features
that may assist in collaboration can't be enabled).

Is Henrik still interested in being the single admin, or should he be
contacted and asked if another person can be added in that role?  I
recall postings where he described health issues and also a desire to
stop working so much on xymon, and I don't fault him for wanting to take
a break.  However, it would be nice to know if he plans to work on the
project again, or if he's done with it and wants to move onto other
things.  I've been around open source long enough to know how the
process works and I respect the developers who put time in on their
projects.  Sure xymon works fine now, but if something changes in a
distro one or more of us are using and it breaks xymon, we'll all have
to make a choice on how to move forward.  It would be best for the
community as a whole if we had an idea of where things stood and where
they might go.

Tom has pretty much hit the nail on the head here.

It's true that I have pretty much stopped working on Xymon development.
I am not quite sure why, but for some time it has just seemed to be
more of a tedious chore than something I would look forward to. I think
the task of getting all the documentation lined up for 4.3.0 (that is the
main outstanding issue for that release) just doesn't seem all that
appealing...

So I would really welcome someone who would be willing to take over the
project management / admin tasks. Even if it were just as a co-admin,
it would still be nice to have someone else with the enthusiasm that
is necessary to push the project forward.

For me, the ideal would be if I could focus on writing code instead of
running the project.

So if you have the ambition and energy of trying to run this project,
please speak up. Choosing a (co-)admin for Xymon is an important
decision, and one that definitely needs some community involvement.
All of you must feel comfortable with the person/persons we choose
for this task.

I like to offer myself as co-admin candidate.
Let me know if all of you like to understand more about me.

Can we have more than 2 project admins ?

tj

Regards,
Henrik

-- 
T.J. Yang

Gruss

        Martin Flemming


Martin Flemming
DESY / IT          office : Building 2b / 008a
Notkestr. 85       phone  : XXX - XXXX - XXXX
22603 Hamburg      mail   : user-f286aaa49a76@xymon.invalid

On 06/30/2010 04:44 PM, Henrik Størner wrote:

Tom has pretty much hit the nail on the head here.
It's true that I have pretty much stopped working on Xymon development.
I am not quite sure why, but for some time it has just seemed to be
more of a tedious chore than something I would look forward to. I think
the task of getting all the documentation lined up for 4.3.0 (that is the
main outstanding issue for that release) just doesn't seem all that
appealing...

So I would really welcome someone who would be willing to take over the
project management / admin tasks. Even if it were just as a co-admin,
it would still be nice to have someone else with the enthusiasm that
is necessary to push the project forward.

For me, the ideal would be if I could focus on writing code instead of
running the project.

So if you have the ambition and energy of trying to run this project,
please speak up. Choosing a (co-)admin for Xymon is an important
decision, and one that definitely needs some community involvement.
All of you must feel comfortable with the person/persons we choose
for this task.


Regards,
Henrik

   

<user-7738cfcc6ae0@xymon.invalid> wrote:

I would like to put myself forward for updating some of the documentation and contributing a number of add-on modules..

I think its best if there is at least a team of 4-5 people who could drive the project and allow henrik to concentrate on the code if he has time..

-P


Padraig Lennon
Senior Systems Integration Engineer

Pioneer Investments Management Ltd
5th Floor |Georges Quay Plaza | Georges Quay | Dublin 2 | Rep. of Ireland
Tel.  +353 (0)1 480.2081

user-7738cfcc6ae0@xymon.invalid | www.pioneerinvestments.com

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Flemming [mailto:user-f286aaa49a76@xymon.invalid]
Sent: 01 July 2010 06:54
To: user-ae9b8668bcde@xymon.invalid
Subject: Re: [hobbit] Any idea on a 4.3.0 third beta (or rc?) timeframe?

I like to offer myself as co-admin candidate.
Let me know if all of you like to understand more about me.

My vote, you've got :-)

Can we have more than 2 project admins ?

tj

Didn't really know, how such project to get best work,
but why not ...

martin


On Wed, 30 Jun 2010, TJ Yang wrote:

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Henrik Størner <user-ce4a2c883f75@xymon.invalid> wrote:

In <user-015db105c324@xymon.invalid> Tom Georgoulias <user-6a0b8b0f0ae1@xymon.invalid> writes:

On 06/28/2010 04:28 AM, Buchan Milne wrote:

There is a developers list for the hobbitmon project on SF. A number of people
are subscribed, including people with commit access.

However, there is currently only one project admin for the SF project, Henrik
(which means no more committers can be added at present, and some features
that may assist in collaboration can't be enabled).

Is Henrik still interested in being the single admin, or should he be
contacted and asked if another person can be added in that role?  I
recall postings where he described health issues and also a desire to
stop working so much on xymon, and I don't fault him for wanting to take
a break.  However, it would be nice to know if he plans to work on the
project again, or if he's done with it and wants to move onto other
things.  I've been around open source long enough to know how the
process works and I respect the developers who put time in on their
projects.  Sure xymon works fine now, but if something changes in a
distro one or more of us are using and it breaks xymon, we'll all have
to make a choice on how to move forward.  It would be best for the
community as a whole if we had an idea of where things stood and where
they might go.

Tom has pretty much hit the nail on the head here.

It's true that I have pretty much stopped working on Xymon development.
I am not quite sure why, but for some time it has just seemed to be
more of a tedious chore than something I would look forward to. I think
the task of getting all the documentation lined up for 4.3.0 (that is the
main outstanding issue for that release) just doesn't seem all that
appealing...

So I would really welcome someone who would be willing to take over the
project management / admin tasks. Even if it were just as a co-admin,
it would still be nice to have someone else with the enthusiasm that
is necessary to push the project forward.

For me, the ideal would be if I could focus on writing code instead of
running the project.

So if you have the ambition and energy of trying to run this project,
please speak up. Choosing a (co-)admin for Xymon is an important
decision, and one that definitely needs some community involvement.
All of you must feel comfortable with the person/persons we choose
for this task.

I like to offer myself as co-admin candidate.
Let me know if all of you like to understand more about me.

Can we have more than 2 project admins ?

tj

Regards,
Henrik

--
T.J. Yang

Gruss

       Martin Flemming


Martin Flemming
DESY / IT          office : Building 2b / 008a

"The information in this e-mail and in any attachments is confidential and intended solely
for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). This information may be subject to legal,
professional or other privilege and further distribution of it is strictly prohibited without
our authority. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorised to and must not
disclose, copy, distribute, or retain this message or any part of it, and should notify us
immediately.

This footnote also confirms that this email has been automatically scanned for the presence
of computer viruses, profanities and certain file types."

Pioneer Investment Management Limited.

1 George’s Quay Plaza, George’s Quay, Dublin 2, Ireland.

Registered in Ireland no. 287793.

--