Hobbitping/xymonping OR fping?
list Josh Luthman
From memory, I remember seeing Henrik suggest fping is better to use then the included (with Xymon) ping tool. I can't find any evidence of this in the mailing list archives, though. Is everyone running xymonping now successfully? Has anyone been forced to fping? Is there an advantage of one over the other? Josh Luthman Office: XXX-XXX-XXXX Direct: XXX-XXX-XXXX XXXX Wayne St Suite XXXX Troy, OH XXXXX
list Henrik Størner
▸
On 22-01-2012 17:49, Josh Luthman wrote:
From memory, I remember seeing Henrik suggest fping is better to use then the included (with Xymon) ping tool. I can't find any evidence of this in the mailing list archives, though. Is everyone running xymonping now successfully? Has anyone been forced to fping? Is there an advantage of one over the other?
My own experience is that fping is a bit more reliable in picking up all responses when testing many systems. Since fping also does IPv6 and xymonping doesn't, I have a strong inclination to drop xymonping for the IPv6-enabled network tester. Regards, Henrik
list Josh Luthman
I will keep fping in my guide based on that experience then. Thanks for the response!
▸
Josh Luthman
Office: XXX-XXX-XXXX
Direct: XXX-XXX-XXXX
XXXX Wayne St
Suite XXXX
Troy, OH XXXXX
▸
On Jan 22, 2012 5:30 PM, "Henrik Størner" <user-ce4a2c883f75@xymon.invalid> wrote:
On 22-01-2012 17:49, Josh Luthman wrote:From memory, I remember seeing Henrik suggest fping is better to use then the included (with Xymon) ping tool. I can't find any evidence of this in the mailing list archives, though. Is everyone running xymonping now successfully? Has anyone been forced to fping? Is there an advantage of one over the other?My own experience is that fping is a bit more reliable in picking up all responses when testing many systems. Since fping also does IPv6 and xymonping doesn't, I have a strong inclination to drop xymonping for the IPv6-enabled network tester. Regards, Henrik ______________________________**
Xymon at xymon.com<