Xymon Mailing List Archive search

How to suppress alerts when combo-testing?

8 messages in this thread

list Carl Melgaard · Thu, 2 Dec 2010 11:44:07 +0100 ·
Hi,

Im monitoring a cluster-setup, a/b-nodes + cluster ressource:

10.83.13.12     bskidmsrv001.bsk.rm.dk       # COMMENT:"SLES11cluster-res" prefer
10.83.13.10     bskidmsrv001a.bsk.rm.dk      # COMMENT:"SLES11a" ldap ldaps ntp ntpd badntp:1:3:3 prefer NOCOLUMNS:ldap,ldaps
10.83.13.11     bskidmsrv001b.bsk.rm.dk      # COMMENT:"SLES11b" ldap ldaps ntp ntpd badntp:1:3:3 prefer NOCOLUMNS:ldap,ldaps

ldap + ldaps will always be red on one of the nodes, so I've made a combotest to insert on the cluster-ressource:

bskidmsrv001.bsk.rm.dk.ldap = ( bskidmsrv001a.bsk.rm.dk.ldap + bskidmsrv001b.bsk.rm.dk.ldap ) == 1
bskidmsrv001.bsk.rm.dk.ldaps = ( bskidmsrv001a.bsk.rm.dk.ldaps + bskidmsrv001b.bsk.rm.dk.ldaps ) == 1

This works on - the green status shows up on the cluster-resseource host - BUT I still get alerting on all the hidden red-tests, and I can still acknowledge all of the tests, I thought I hid away with NOCOLUMNS.

How do I achieve this - ie. suppressing the red alerts on the nodes where ldap/ldaps is not running?

Regards,

Carl Melgaard
list Carl Melgaard · Tue, 7 Dec 2010 15:27:57 +0100 ·
Hi,

Noone has a suggestion to, how I can suppress and hide tests only used in my combotest below? I need to make the red-tests disappear, so they wont create noise in the alerting or the acknowledge-page. How can I hide red-alerts and suppress alerting on them?

/melgaard
quoted from Carl Melgaard

Fra: Carl Melgaard [mailto:user-cdea55422fa4@xymon.invalid]
Sendt: 2. december 2010 11:44
Til: 'xymon at xymon.com'
Emne: [xymon] How to suppress alerts when combo-testing?

Hi,

Im monitoring a cluster-setup, a/b-nodes + cluster ressource:

10.83.13.12     bskidmsrv001.bsk.rm.dk       # COMMENT:"SLES11cluster-res" prefer
10.83.13.10     bskidmsrv001a.bsk.rm.dk      # COMMENT:"SLES11a" ldap ldaps ntp ntpd badntp:1:3:3 prefer NOCOLUMNS:ldap,ldaps
10.83.13.11     bskidmsrv001b.bsk.rm.dk      # COMMENT:"SLES11b" ldap ldaps ntp ntpd badntp:1:3:3 prefer NOCOLUMNS:ldap,ldaps

ldap + ldaps will always be red on one of the nodes, so I've made a combotest to insert on the cluster-ressource:

bskidmsrv001.bsk.rm.dk.ldap = ( bskidmsrv001a.bsk.rm.dk.ldap + bskidmsrv001b.bsk.rm.dk.ldap ) == 1
bskidmsrv001.bsk.rm.dk.ldaps = ( bskidmsrv001a.bsk.rm.dk.ldaps + bskidmsrv001b.bsk.rm.dk.ldaps ) == 1

This works on - the green status shows up on the cluster-resseource host - BUT I still get alerting on all the hidden red-tests, and I can still acknowledge all of the tests, I thought I hid away with NOCOLUMNS.

How do I achieve this - ie. suppressing the red alerts on the nodes where ldap/ldaps is not running?

Regards,

Carl Melgaard
list Bruce White · Tue, 7 Dec 2010 09:44:25 -0600 ·
Use the EXSERVICE Tag in your alerts config file and the NOCOLUMNS tag
in your bb-hosts file.  The first will stop alerts from being sent, the
second will stop the column from appearing on your web page.   

 
 
 Bruce White
 Senior Enterprise Systems Engineer | Phone: XXX-XXX-XXXX | Fax: XXX-XXX-XXXX | user-58f975e8bf9d@xymon.invalid | http://www.fellowes.com/
 
 
 
Disclaimer: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Fellowes, Inc.
quoted from Carl Melgaard
 

From: Carl Melgaard [mailto:user-cdea55422fa4@xymon.invalid] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 8:28 AM
To: 'xymon at xymon.com'
Subject: [xymon] SV: How to suppress alerts when combo-testing?

 
Hi,

 
Noone has a suggestion to, how I can suppress and hide tests only used
in my combotest below? I need to make the red-tests disappear, so they
wont create noise in the alerting or the acknowledge-page. How can I
hide red-alerts and suppress alerting on them?

 
/melgaard

 
Fra: Carl Melgaard [mailto:user-cdea55422fa4@xymon.invalid] 
Sendt: 2. december 2010 11:44
Til: 'xymon at xymon.com'
Emne: [xymon] How to suppress alerts when combo-testing?

 
Hi,

 
Im monitoring a cluster-setup, a/b-nodes + cluster ressource:

 
10.83.13.12     bskidmsrv001.bsk.rm.dk       #
COMMENT:"SLES11cluster-res" prefer

10.83.13.10     bskidmsrv001a.bsk.rm.dk      # COMMENT:"SLES11a" ldap
ldaps ntp ntpd badntp:1:3:3 prefer NOCOLUMNS:ldap,ldaps

10.83.13.11     bskidmsrv001b.bsk.rm.dk      # COMMENT:"SLES11b" ldap
ldaps ntp ntpd badntp:1:3:3 prefer NOCOLUMNS:ldap,ldaps

 
ldap + ldaps will always be red on one of the nodes, so I've made a
combotest to insert on the cluster-ressource:

 
bskidmsrv001.bsk.rm.dk.ldap = ( bskidmsrv001a.bsk.rm.dk.ldap +
bskidmsrv001b.bsk.rm.dk.ldap ) == 1

bskidmsrv001.bsk.rm.dk.ldaps = ( bskidmsrv001a.bsk.rm.dk.ldaps +
bskidmsrv001b.bsk.rm.dk.ldaps ) == 1

 
This works on - the green status shows up on the cluster-resseource host
- BUT I still get alerting on all the hidden red-tests, and I can still
acknowledge all of the tests, I thought I hid away with NOCOLUMNS.

 
How do I achieve this - ie. suppressing the red alerts on the nodes
where ldap/ldaps is not running?

 
Regards,

 
Carl Melgaard
list Carl Melgaard · Tue, 7 Dec 2010 22:58:44 +0100 ·
Hi,

I recall trying this, and it stops alerting ok, and hides the red tests, BUT - all the red tests still show up in the "acknowledge alert"-page, which gets very annoying in the long run. Maybe I did something wrongly - am I supposed to delete the test before hiding them with NOCOLUMN?

/melgaard
quoted from Bruce White

Fra: White, Bruce [user-58f975e8bf9d@xymon.invalid]
Sendt: 7. december 2010 16:44
Til: xymon at xymon.com
Emne: RE: [xymon] SV: How to suppress alerts when combo-testing?

Use the EXSERVICE Tag in your alerts config file and the NOCOLUMNS tag in your bb-hosts file.  The first will stop alerts from being sent, the second will stop the column from appearing on your web page.


 Bruce White

 Senior Enterprise Systems Engineer | Phone: XXX-XXX-XXXX | Fax: XXX-XXX-XXXX | user-58f975e8bf9d@xymon.invalid | www.fellowes.com<http://www.fellowes.com/>;


[cid:fellbrand1.jpg at ed5d4399.9b5a45fb]
quoted from Bruce White


Disclaimer: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Fellowes, Inc.


From: Carl Melgaard [mailto:user-cdea55422fa4@xymon.invalid]
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 8:28 AM
To: 'xymon at xymon.com'
Subject: [xymon] SV: How to suppress alerts when combo-testing?

Hi,

Noone has a suggestion to, how I can suppress and hide tests only used in my combotest below? I need to make the red-tests disappear, so they wont create noise in the alerting or the acknowledge-page. How can I hide red-alerts and suppress alerting on them?

/melgaard

Fra: Carl Melgaard [mailto:user-cdea55422fa4@xymon.invalid]
Sendt: 2. december 2010 11:44
Til: 'xymon at xymon.com'
Emne: [xymon] How to suppress alerts when combo-testing?

Hi,

Im monitoring a cluster-setup, a/b-nodes + cluster ressource:

10.83.13.12     bskidmsrv001.bsk.rm.dk       # COMMENT:"SLES11cluster-res" prefer
10.83.13.10     bskidmsrv001a.bsk.rm.dk      # COMMENT:"SLES11a" ldap ldaps ntp ntpd badntp:1:3:3 prefer NOCOLUMNS:ldap,ldaps
10.83.13.11     bskidmsrv001b.bsk.rm.dk      # COMMENT:"SLES11b” ldap ldaps ntp ntpd badntp:1:3:3 prefer NOCOLUMNS:ldap,ldaps

ldap + ldaps will always be red on one of the nodes, so I’ve made a combotest to insert on the cluster-ressource:

bskidmsrv001.bsk.rm.dk.ldap = ( bskidmsrv001a.bsk.rm.dk.ldap + bskidmsrv001b.bsk.rm.dk.ldap ) == 1
bskidmsrv001.bsk.rm.dk.ldaps = ( bskidmsrv001a.bsk.rm.dk.ldaps + bskidmsrv001b.bsk.rm.dk.ldaps ) == 1

This works on – the green status shows up on the cluster-resseource host – BUT I still get alerting on all the hidden red-tests, and I can still acknowledge all of the tests, I thought I hid away with NOCOLUMNS.

How do I achieve this – ie. suppressing the red alerts on the nodes where ldap/ldaps is not running?

Regards,

Carl Melgaard
list Bruce White · Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:45:53 -0600 ·
Melgaard,

 
I do not know a way to stop this.   Anyone else have an idea?

 
        .....Bruce
signature

 
 
 Bruce White
 Senior Enterprise Systems Engineer | Phone: XXX-XXX-XXXX | Fax: XXX-XXX-XXXX | user-58f975e8bf9d@xymon.invalid | http://www.fellowes.com/
 
 
 
Disclaimer: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Fellowes, Inc.
 

quoted from Carl Melgaard
From: Carl Melgaard [mailto:user-cdea55422fa4@xymon.invalid] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 3:59 PM
To: xymon at xymon.com
Subject: SV: [xymon] SV: How to suppress alerts when combo-testing?

 
Hi,

 
I recall trying this, and it stops alerting ok, and hides the red tests,
BUT - all the red tests still show up in the "acknowledge alert"-page,
which gets very annoying in the long run. Maybe I did something wrongly
- am I supposed to delete the test before hiding them with NOCOLUMN?

 
/melgaard

 
Fra: White, Bruce [user-58f975e8bf9d@xymon.invalid]
Sendt: 7. december 2010 16:44
Til: xymon at xymon.com
Emne: RE: [xymon] SV: How to suppress alerts when combo-testing?

Use the EXSERVICE Tag in your alerts config file and the NOCOLUMNS tag
in your bb-hosts file.  The first will stop alerts from being sent, the
second will stop the column from appearing on your web page.   

 
 Bruce White

 Senior Enterprise Systems Engineer | Phone: XXX-XXX-XXXX | Fax:

XXX-XXX-XXXX | user-58f975e8bf9d@xymon.invalid | www.fellowes.com
quoted from Carl Melgaard
<http://www.fellowes.com/>; 

 
Disclaimer: The information contained in this message may be privileged
and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the
message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Fellowes, Inc.

 
From: Carl Melgaard [mailto:user-cdea55422fa4@xymon.invalid] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 8:28 AM
To: 'xymon at xymon.com'
Subject: [xymon] SV: How to suppress alerts when combo-testing?

 
Hi,

 
Noone has a suggestion to, how I can suppress and hide tests only used
in my combotest below? I need to make the red-tests disappear, so they
wont create noise in the alerting or the acknowledge-page. How can I
hide red-alerts and suppress alerting on them?

 
/melgaard

 
Fra: Carl Melgaard [mailto:user-cdea55422fa4@xymon.invalid] 
Sendt: 2. december 2010 11:44
Til: 'xymon at xymon.com'
Emne: [xymon] How to suppress alerts when combo-testing?

 
Hi,

 
Im monitoring a cluster-setup, a/b-nodes + cluster ressource:

 
10.83.13.12     bskidmsrv001.bsk.rm.dk       #
COMMENT:"SLES11cluster-res" prefer

10.83.13.10     bskidmsrv001a.bsk.rm.dk      # COMMENT:"SLES11a" ldap
ldaps ntp ntpd badntp:1:3:3 prefer NOCOLUMNS:ldap,ldaps

10.83.13.11     bskidmsrv001b.bsk.rm.dk      # COMMENT:"SLES11b" ldap
ldaps ntp ntpd badntp:1:3:3 prefer NOCOLUMNS:ldap,ldaps

 
ldap + ldaps will always be red on one of the nodes, so I've made a
combotest to insert on the cluster-ressource:

 
bskidmsrv001.bsk.rm.dk.ldap = ( bskidmsrv001a.bsk.rm.dk.ldap +
bskidmsrv001b.bsk.rm.dk.ldap ) == 1

bskidmsrv001.bsk.rm.dk.ldaps = ( bskidmsrv001a.bsk.rm.dk.ldaps +
bskidmsrv001b.bsk.rm.dk.ldaps ) == 1

 
This works on - the green status shows up on the cluster-resseource host
- BUT I still get alerting on all the hidden red-tests, and I can still
acknowledge all of the tests, I thought I hid away with NOCOLUMNS.

 
How do I achieve this - ie. suppressing the red alerts on the nodes
where ldap/ldaps is not running?

 
Regards,

 
Carl Melgaard
list Henrik Størner · Wed, 8 Dec 2010 21:22:22 +0000 (UTC) ·
On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 11:44:07 +0100, Carl Melgaard wrote:
Im monitoring a cluster-setup, a/b-nodes + cluster ressource:

10.83.13.12 bskidmsrv001  # COMMENT:"SLES11cluster-res" \
                            prefer 
10.83.13.10 bskidmsrv001a # COMMENT:"SLES11a" \
                            ldap ldaps ntp ntpd \
                            badntp:1:3:3 prefer \
                            NOCOLUMNS:ldap,ldaps
10.83.13.11 bskidmsrv001b # COMMENT:"SLES11b" \
quoted from Bruce White
                            ldap ldaps ntp ntpd \
                            badntp:1:3:3 prefer \
                            NOCOLUMNS:ldap,ldaps

ldap + ldaps will always be red on one of the nodes, so I've made a
combotest to insert on the cluster-ressource:

bskidmsrv001.ldap=(bskidmsrv001a.ldap + bskidmsrv001b.ldap) == 1
bskidmsrv001.ldaps=(bskidmsrv001a.ldaps+bskidmsrv001b.ldaps) == 1
quoted from Bruce White

This works on - the green status shows up on the cluster-resseource host
- BUT I still get alerting on all the hidden red-tests, and I can still
acknowledge all of the tests, I thought I hid away with NOCOLUMNS.

How do I achieve this - ie. suppressing the red alerts on the nodes
where ldap/ldaps is not running?
Xymon has a problem with clusters. It should be possible to tell Xymon
that "these nodes are in a cluster, so don't alert me unless at
least N of them are down at the same time". Right now, it isn't.

So if you want to eliminate the red status on the individual nodes
in the cluster, you cannot do that.

If it's only the alerts you want to stop, then you can configure 
no alerts to be sent for the individual nodes - only send alerts
for the cluster status (bskidmsrv001.ldap or .ldaps).


Regards,
Henrik
list Carl Melgaard · Thu, 9 Dec 2010 09:43:22 +0100 ·
quoted from Henrik Størner
Xymon has a problem with clusters. It should be possible to tell Xymon
that "these nodes are in a cluster, so don't alert me unless at
least N of them are down at the same time". Right now, it isn't.

So if you want to eliminate the red status on the individual nodes
in the cluster, you cannot do that.
Can I put up a feature request for this? Or have NOCOLUMNS suppress the behind-the-scenes red-alerts for acknowledge too?
quoted from Henrik Størner
If it's only the alerts you want to stop, then you can configure 
no alerts to be sent for the individual nodes - only send alerts
for the cluster status (bskidmsrv001.ldap or .ldaps).
Yeah, that what I do now - but with a lot of clustered services, the acknowledge-page is my biggest worry.

Regards,

Carl Melgaard
list Henrik Størner · Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:13:46 +0000 (UTC) ·
quoted from Carl Melgaard
In <user-864e37a66155@xymon.invalid> Carl Melgaard <user-cdea55422fa4@xymon.invalid> writes:
Xymon has a problem with clusters. It should be possible to tell Xymon
that "these nodes are in a cluster, so don't alert me unless at
least N of them are down at the same time". Right now, it isn't.

So if you want to eliminate the red status on the individual nodes
in the cluster, you cannot do that.
Can I put up a feature request for this? Or have NOCOLUMNS suppress the beh=
ind-the-scenes red-alerts for acknowledge too?
Certainly :-) It's a problem for me as well, so it will be fixed
sometime.


Regards,
Henrik