Josh,
Not sure what you were saying there?
My goal is that if eto's conn goes red, that standby's conn should go
clear if it also fails.
Does my depends statement not appear to work in that fashion?
--Patrick
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Josh Luthman
<user-4c45a83f15cb@xymon.invalid> wrote:
In stanby's DEPENDS statement referring to eto - not the testing of the host.
Josh Luthman
Office: XXX-XXX-XXXX
Direct: XXX-XXX-XXXX
XXXX Wayne St
Suite XXXX
Troy, OH XXXXX
“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue that counts.”
--- Winston Churchill
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Patrick Nixon <user-1f2406f832af@xymon.invalid> wrote:
They're both testip
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Josh Luthman
<user-4c45a83f15cb@xymon.invalid> wrote:
Looks right to me, maybe domain related (FQDN)?
Josh Luthman
Office: XXX-XXX-XXXX
Direct: XXX-XXX-XXXX
XXXX Wayne St
Suite XXXX
Troy, OH XXXXX
“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue that counts.”
--- Winston Churchill
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Patrick Nixon <user-1f2406f832af@xymon.invalid> wrote:
Hey all,
I'm trying to get depends working, but it's not working the way I expect it to.
<bb-hosts snippet>
10.18.16.172 standby # conn testip
depends=(conn:eto/conn)
10.18.16.174 eto # conn ssh snmp testip
eto is currently red, but standby, which is down as well, is also red.
anything specific wrong with my depends statement? Any reason why
conn wouldn't be able to depend on something else?
Thanks!
--Patrick