On 1 July 2013 15:57, Yuki Matsushita <user-f21c28c3bb60@xymon.invalid> wrote:
In addition, I found a typo in line 251.
This! Domo arigato Yuki-san!
Yes, this has been bugging me for almost 2 years (when I reported the
resultant segfault it to the List). I haven't been able to use any
"trigger" clauses in all that time. It's still broken in the current trunk
(rev 7257).
I'm guessing, from reading the code, that I could work around this by
always have exactly the same number of "trigger" lines as "ignore" lines -
perhaps padding out with bogus "trigger" or "ignore" lines.
But obviously would be better to have it fixed. Henrik, do you need a
patch submitted for this one-line fix?
J