-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 12/11/2012 03:22 PM, user-87556346d4af@xymon.invalid wrote:
My xymond test is often yellow, and near as I can tell, the
reason is often that I have so-called "multi-source statuses."
However, the "second" source is the Xymon server, and this
appears to happen most often when tests are disabled (as the blue
status comes from the Xymon server). Should I be ignoring this?
Is there a misconfiguration somewhere that has this server not
properly identifying messages from itself?
Thanks for your help.
Not sure entirely what you're referring to here... Can you provide
sample output from the different tests?
If you click on the "xymond" dot, I get the following much of the way
down the page (you can see this on yours too, but it will be blank
most likely):
Multi-source statuses
www-test.umdnj.edu:conn reported by 10.32.5.120 and 130.219.XXX.XXX
www-test.umdnj.edu:cpu reported by 10.32.5.120 and 10.32.5.106
www-test.umdnj.edu:disk reported by 10.32.5.120 and 10.32.5.106
www-test.umdnj.edu:files reported by 10.32.5.120 and 10.32.5.106
www-test.umdnj.edu:fma reported by 10.32.5.120 and 10.32.5.106
www-test.umdnj.edu:ftp reported by 10.32.5.120 and 130.219.XXX.XXX
www-test.umdnj.edu:memory reported by 10.32.5.120 and 10.32.5.106
www-test.umdnj.edu:msgs reported by 10.32.5.120 and 10.32.5.106
www-test.umdnj.edu:ports reported by 10.32.5.120 and 10.32.5.106
www-test.umdnj.edu:procs reported by 10.32.5.120 and 10.32.5.106
www-test.umdnj.edu:raid reported by 10.32.5.120 and 10.32.5.106
www-test.umdnj.edu:telnet reported by 10.32.5.120 and 130.219.XXX.XXX
www-test.umdnj.edu:temp reported by 10.32.5.120 and 10.32.5.106
www-test.umdnj.edu:vmio reported by 10.32.5.120 and 10.32.5.106
www-test.umdnj.edu:zfs reported by 10.32.5.120 and 10.32.5.106
...(the former is the Xymon server) and I just figured out the
specific case that causes it. If you disable the server with
"$XYMONHOME/server/bin/xymon $XYMONDISP 'disable host.domain.com* 5m
Testing' etc. instead of using the GUI, you will see this. It appears
that doing it via the GUI does not result in this happening. Bug of
feature?
- --
- ---- _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | |Ryan Novosielski - Sr. Systems Programmer
|$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| |user-ae4522577e16@xymon.invalid - 973/972.0922 (2-0922)
\__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent.|IST/EI-Academic Svcs. - ADMC 450, Newark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlDHmSAACgkQmb+gadEcsb70uACfYDsOaneBZ3I7sB9ZfPq/+xn/
DNMAnRYLXKtHBWcIBpQ9IGM56o4Nu3/w
=emGB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----