Because the process is not NerdSysMon_Nerd.py in the ps you have shown,
it is "su" and "python2.3" respectively....
Tom
On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 20:03 -0400, Sue Bauer-Lee wrote:
Can someone please tell me why this first entry in bb-proctab is correctly
monitored: (6 instances are correctly reported)
tucfep106::mingetty;>=1
where the processes are:
root 1627 0.0 0.0 1524 356 tty1 S 2004 0:00 /sbin/mingetty tty1
root 1628 0.0 0.0 1496 356 tty2 S 2004 0:00 /sbin/mingetty tty2
root 1629 0.0 0.0 1516 356 tty3 S 2004 0:00 /sbin/mingetty tty3
root 1630 0.0 0.0 1516 360 tty4 S 2004 0:00 /sbin/mingetty tty4
root 1631 0.0 0.0 1508 356 tty5 S 2004 0:00 /sbin/mingetty tty5
root 1632 0.0 0.0 1504 356 tty6 S 2004 0:00 /sbin/mingetty tty6
And this one isn't: (1 instance is reported but it reports failure/red - I even
tried specifiying the full path of /opt/switchapps/env_2-83/scripts/NerdSysMon_Nerd.py)
tucfep106::NerdSysMon_Nerd.py;>=1
where the processes are:
root 19572 0.0 0.0 4220 964 ? S Jun01 0:00 su - envision -c /opt/switchapps/env_2-83/scripts/NerdSysMon_Nerd.py
envision 19574 0.0 0.8 40548 8624 ? S Jun01 0:17 /usr/bin/python2.3 /opt/switchapps/env_2-83/scripts/NerdSysMon_Nerd.py