On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, Buchan Milne wrote:
Well, I have discussed this many times, but there are a number of spec
files
floating around, and most of them don't take upgrading (e.g. 4.2.3 to
4.3.x)
into account, and many fix different issues, but almost no-one seems to be
willing to discuss what must be fixed, and contribute to fixing the spec
file
in svn.
I would love to discuss what needs to be fixed to get a good set of rpms
for
RHEL/centos/fedora. The problem is that many people want rpms for other rpm
based distros that I have no experience with. I have seen many attempts in
the
past to maintain distro agnostic rpms with very limited success.