Hi Betsy and Jeremy,
no, I don't have an example for the test you asked for, Jeremy. We'll follow Betsy's hint and upgrade to 4.3.10
thank you for helping,
Rolf
Upgrading to the 4.3.10 client fixed out oddball negative memory reports, which we had on servers with more than 128G RAM
On Sep 19, 2013, at 9:06 PM, Jeremy Laidman <user-71895fb2e44c@xymon.invalid <mailto:user-71895fb2e44c@xymon.invalid>> wrote:
On 19 September 2013 17:38, Rolf Schrittenlocher <user-4b3b4051a09b@xymon.invalid <mailto:user-4b3b4051a09b@xymon.invalid>> wrote:
My idea is that values larger than 10 Gb are calculated the wrong
way (because all zones using total memory less than 10 Gb are
presented correctly). But I cannot find the place to fix this.
Any ideas or hints?
Perhaps it's not a special case for >10G, but perhaps it's an overflow at 8G, so that anything larger than that goes negative. I'm guessing 8G (rather than 10G) would be the threshold, as it's a power of two. Are you able to reduce the zone's RAM allocation to a little greater, and then a little less than 8G to see if this is the case? Or do you have examples of correctly displayed values greater than 8G and less that 10G? By 8G, I mean exactly 2^33=8589934592 (or perhaps one less).
J
--
Mit freundlichen Gruessen
Rolf Schrittenlocher
Lokales Bibliothekssystem Frankfurt
Senckenberganlage 31, 60054 Frankfurt
Tel: (XX) XX - XXX XXXXX Fax: (XX) XX XXX XXXXX
LBS: user-1e39a1813094@xymon.invalid
Persoenlich: user-4b3b4051a09b@xymon.invalid