(2013/08/09 16:44), Jeremy Laidman wrote:
On 1 July 2013 15:57, Yuki Matsushita <user-f21c28c3bb60@xymon.invalid> wrote:
In addition, I found a typo in line 251.
This! Domo arigato Yuki-san!
Yes, this has been bugging me for almost 2 years (when I reported the
resultant segfault it to the List). I haven't been able to use any
"trigger" clauses in all that time. It's still broken in the current trunk
(rev 7257).
Thanks for your response, Jeremy.
Dou itashimashite.
I'm guessing, from reading the code, that I could work around this by
always have exactly the same number of "trigger" lines as "ignore"
lines -
perhaps padding out with bogus "trigger" or "ignore" lines.
Thanks for analysing this issue. I think so too.
Regards,
Yuki