Betsy,
Have you noticed any difference in success depending on how you're
specifying the duration? (eg, "1d" vs "24h", etc.?)
There's one "magic value" relating to a full day when we're generating the
ack code to begin with, but on walking through the module code I can't see
how it would cause an effect like this.
After the acknowledgement, the expiration time of the current one should
be displayed on the status page for that test. Can you confirm that the
pending date in those cases is what you'd expect it to be?
Sort of grasping at straws here. I'll keep digging in, but so far things
seem to be working correctly for me.
Regards,
-jc
On Mon, October 19, 2015 10:38 am, Novosielski, Ryan wrote:
My suspicion would be that the test briefly exits the bad state, or you
have a problem with a clock somewhere. One weird issue that I used to
have
is if I set acknowledgments too long (we are talking like 999 weeks),
IRIX
would expire them almost immediately. But that would not happen under
your
circumstance certainly.
--
____ *Note: UMDNJ is now Rutgers-Biomedical and Health Sciences*
|| \\UTGERS |---------------------*O*---------------------
||_// Biomedical | Ryan Novosielski - Senior Technologist
|| \\ and Health | user-46c89e614701@xymon.invalid<mailto:user-46c89e614701@xymon.invalid>-
973/972.0922 (2x0922)
|| \\ Sciences | OIRT/High Perf & Res Comp - MSB C630, Newark
`'
On Oct 19, 2015, at 13:07, Betsy Schwartz
<user-c61747246f66@xymon.invalid<mailto:user-c61747246f66@xymon.invalid>> wrote:
our acks always always always seem to time out
what are we doing differently?
we're running xymon 4.3.21 on RHEL6
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Ralph Mitchell
<user-00a5e44c48c0@xymon.invalid<mailto:user-00a5e44c48c0@xymon.invalid>> wrote:
I have ack-by-email set up, and can send multi-day/week acks without a
problem.
Ralph Mitchell
On Oct 19, 2015 11:02 AM, "Root, Paul T"
<user-76fdb6883669@xymon.invalid<mailto:user-76fdb6883669@xymon.invalid>> wrote:
I was just doing an ack for 1+ days.
It will only get cancelled if the test in question goes green however
briefly.
A disable will persist if it is set to expire at a certain time.
From: Xymon
[mailto:xymon-bounces at xymon.com<mailto:xymon-bounces at xymon.com>] On
Behalf
Of Novosielski, Ryan
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 9:59 AM
To: user-c61747246f66@xymon.invalid<mailto:user-c61747246f66@xymon.invalid>
Cc: xymon at xymon.com<mailto:xymon at xymon.com>
Subject: Re: [Xymon] Anyone got a patch for the 24-hour limit on ACKS? Or
a script to invoke acknowledge.sh?
I have never found acks to have a 24 hour limit. Can anyone confirm
whether this is definitely true or not?
____ *Note: UMDNJ is now Rutgers-Biomedical and Health Sciences*
|| \\UTGERS |---------------------*O*---------------------
||_// Biomedical | Ryan Novosielski - Senior Technologist
|| \\ and Health | user-46c89e614701@xymon.invalid<mailto:user-46c89e614701@xymon.invalid>-
973/972.0922<tel:973%2F972.0922> (2x0922)
|| \\ Sciences | OIRT/High Perf & Res Comp - MSB C630, Newark
`'
On Oct 19, 2015, at 10:57, Betsy Schwartz
<user-c61747246f66@xymon.invalid<mailto:user-c61747246f66@xymon.invalid>> wrote:
We've GOT to be able to ack alerts and have the ack survive the weekend.
(if I can call acknowledge.sh from perl I have a script that can scrape
the board and re-ack)
thank you!!