OK, let's scrap the idea of HMON.
But I still think we need to give more consideration to a more
PHB-acceptable name.
Regards
Vernon
From: Josh Luthman [mailto:user-4c45a83f15cb@xymon.invalid] Sent: Friday, 1 August 2008 12:23 PM
To: user-ae9b8668bcde@xymon.invalid
Subject: Re: [hobbit] "Hobbit" name legal stuff; slight name change
willhappen
At this point in time:
h-mon.com is taken
h-mon.net is free
Josh Luthman
Office: XXX-XXX-XXXX
Direct: XXX-XXX-XXXX
XXXX Wayne St
Suite XXXX
Troy, OH XXXXX
Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 12:18 AM, Tim McCloskey <user-2644b182ab49@xymon.invalid> wrote:
Though I thought hmon would be simple it appears there is a
company already doing business here in the US called hmon... (hmon dot
net). Oh well, darn lawyers anyway....
Everett, Vernon wrote:
Hobbitmon, it not bad, but I think PHB's might be more
receptive to HMON.
NOTICE: This email and any attachments are confidential. They may contain legally privileged information or copyright material. You must not read, copy, use or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete both messages and all attachments.