Wrong (or badly interpreted) http response time with hobbit 4.2.0

Many recommend that.  I think it should be standard practice.

Josh Luthman
Office: XXX-XXX-XXXX
Direct: XXX-XXX-XXXX
XXXX Wayne St
Suite XXXX
Troy, OH XXXXX


On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Ralph Mitchell <user-00a5e44c48c0@xymon.invalid> wrote:

I think I've seen Henrik (or maybe someone else) recommend installing a
local caching name server alongside Xymon because every name is queried
every time it's used.
Ralph Mitchell

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Josh Luthman <user-4c45a83f15cb@xymon.invalid>
wrote:

I want to say that Xymon doesn't use cache, issuing a query upon every
new host, but I am not certain.

Josh Luthman
Office: XXX-XXX-XXXX
Direct: XXX-XXX-XXXX
XXXX Wayne St
Suite XXXX
Troy, OH XXXXX


On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Benoit SCHMID <user-eb70faf94883@xymon.invalid>
wrote:

Hello,

As I have already said, this would be dur to the dns,
I would have had the pb with wget too wouldn't I?

Regards,

Tony Larco a écrit :

I am wondering if you have a DNS issue causing latency.  Just a
thought.

"Neil Franken" <user-507e5171be69@xymon.invalid> wrote:

Have you done a trace route from the Xymon server? Maybe that would
show
you something? Sorry just a suggestion from the top of my head.


-----Original Message-----
From: Benoit SCHMID [mailto:user-eb70faf94883@xymon.invalid] Sent: 01 September
2010 08:36 AM
To: xymon at xymon.com
Subject: [xymon] Wrong (or badly interpreted) http response time with
hobbit 4.2.0

Hello,

I have monitored machines that are reporting around 3.5 seconds
for the HTTP response time during the whole day (curve flat).

If I do wgets, from the Solaris machine where hobbit server is
installed,
I get response times that is lower than 100 ms.

Our old BB server reports response times that are also lower than 100
ms.

Would you know why my hobbit monitor report such high response times?

Thanks in advance for your answer.