Xymon Mailing List Archive search

Is there a way to "quietly" disable hosts that have NOTICE set?

list Pnixon
Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:30:30 -0400
Message-Id: <user-8787b4bddca3@xymon.invalid>

Here's another solution....
 Write a script to handle the paging for this server and service (oracle).
It checks to see if the backup is running, if so, don't page, if not, page.
 --Pat

From: Charles Jones [mailto:user-e86b4aeade4e@xymon.invalid] Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 1:22 PM
To: user-ae9b8668bcde@xymon.invalid
Subject: Re: [hobbit] Is there a way to "quietly" disable hosts that have
NOTICE set?


If you are oncall, do you want to get woken up by the DISABLE notice alerts
every 5 mins at 3am (or even one of them)? :-)

Before you say "don't use NOTICE in hobbit-alerts.cfg then", consider that
when things are purposefully disabled for reasons other than scheduled
downtime, folks want to know about it.

-Charles

user-c102b8958c7a@xymon.invalid <mailto:user-c102b8958c7a@xymon.invalid>  wrote: 
Have your script disable it every five minutes or so until the backup is

done? 


-----Original Message-----

From: Charles Jones [mailto:user-e86b4aeade4e@xymon.invalid <mailto:user-e86b4aeade4e@xymon.invalid> ] 
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 1:03 PM

To: user-ae9b8668bcde@xymon.invalid <mailto:user-ae9b8668bcde@xymon.invalid> 
Subject: Re: [hobbit] Is there a way to "quietly" disable hosts that have

NOTICE set?


Yep...I tried doing a disable for -1 (until OK), but if you do that while

the service is still green, it immediately recovers.


Ralph Mitchell wrote:

  
On 9/25/06, Charles Jones  <mailto:user-e86b4aeade4e@xymon.invalid> <user-e86b4aeade4e@xymon.invalid>
wrote:

    
 The DOWNTIME option in bb-hosts has the ability to set the status of 
services blue without sending NOTICE alerts. I would like this same 
ability on an interactive basis (via a message to hobbit using the bb 
command).


So, essentially you need DOWNTIME to have something like the "until 
green again" option that was added to the enable/disable page in 4.2, 
right??


Unless I've completely missed your point, for which I apologise in

advance...:)


Ralph Mitchell