I second Tom's statement here.
We may have to maintain separate clients, but I would think the majority of supported systems represented here are headless or have no GUI.
Sent from my iPhone
Please ignore spelling/grammar.
On Jul 2, 2010, at 10:44 AM, Tom Georgoulias <user-6a0b8b0f0ae1@xymon.invalid> wrote:
On 07/02/2010 05:47 AM, Neil Franken wrote:
Xymon is just one part of the equation for me. I see a lot of
potential for Xymon in the Windows world but the BBWin client is well
a very quiet project as well. I am not sure yet if we would maybe
fork the code or create a new client. At this point I would suggest
that maybe we look at a Java based client for xymon so we can run on
a huge variety of platforms with one client. Anyway the whole client
is a whole different ball game.
I would not be in favor of a java based client, the current design is much better on unix systems. It's one of the reasons xymon works well.
Tom