Xymon Mailing List Archive search

Different Tests for different clients: but same localclient.cfg

list William Ottley
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:13:52 -0400
Message-Id: <user-021d55cfadcd@xymon.invalid>

I found Ghost report, but there aren¹t any clients on there.
Is there a configuration file I need to modify to get them on there?


On 19/03/09 4:30 PM, "Ralph Mitchell" <user-00a5e44c48c0@xymon.invalid> wrote:
There should be a "ghost report" entry in the Reports drop down menu on any of
your Xymon web pages.

Ralph Mitchell


On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:22 PM, William Ottley <user-432013e2e0c6@xymon.invalid> wrote:
Ahhh ok, I can look into that. But ummm :$ ³ghosts report²? Sorry not to sure
where that is...


On 3/19/09 4:18 PM, "Hubbard, Greg L" <user-d970b5e56ec9@xymon.invalid> wrote:
Your Mac client is probably not communicating correctly with the Hobbit
server on your Solaris 10 machine.  Check your ghosts report to see if you
have a naming mismatch between your bb-hosts file and what the Darwin client
is sending.  If there is a mismatch, you either fix it at the client (with a
startup parameter for the bbclient process) or at the server end with a
CLIENT tag in the bb-hosts file.  (Or something like that, I am working from
memory).
 GLH
  

 From: William Ottley  [mailto:user-432013e2e0c6@xymon.invalid]
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 3:09  PM
To: user-ae9b8668bcde@xymon.invalid
Subject: [hobbit] Different Tests  for different clients: but same
localclient.cfg

 
Hi all,

I compiled the client for solaris 10  and for the mac OSX.
They have been added to the bbhosts file on the hobbit  server.
They both have the same localclient.cfg, pointing to the hobbit  server.

I¹m trying to get all the tests to show up.
But only some  of them do so. What needs to be changed to do so?

Solaris10:  Bbd,  conn, cpu,  disk, files, http,  info,  memory,  msgs,
  ports,   procs,  trends
OSX:    conn,  info, trends

The mac has almost no tests on it: is this because the  server isn¹t
talking to the client?

Any help would be  appreciated.

Thanks

Will


On 19/03/09 2:38 PM, "Taylor  Lewick" <user-ccbabb0b3ab0@xymon.invalid>  wrote:

 
Is anyone doing anything to be alerted on a per Core  basis instead of
overall CPU.  This would apply to both Linux and  Windows, under windows
using the bbwin  clientŠ
-- 
This message has been scanned for dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.