Xymon Mailing List Archive search

rrd logs and graphs

list Vernon Everett
Sat, 21 Mar 2015 07:16:38 +0800
Message-Id: <CAGo4kcbv=user-227d7a4b1c60@xymon.invalid>

Hi Jeremy

That thought occurred to me, but I checked.
There is only one [power] entry in the graphs.cfg file.
And I put it there for this particular test.

Would have made this one too easy if it was that. :-)

Regards
Vernon


On 20 March 2015 at 16:43, Jeremy Laidman <user-71895fb2e44c@xymon.invalid> wrote:
Vernon

The power status page must refer to a different graph name in graphs.cfg
with a different FNPATTERN.

Click on the graphs images for each version to get the 4-graph view and
compare the URLs.

J

On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 19:35 Vernon Everett <user-b3f8dacb72c8@xymon.invalid> wrote:
Hi all

I was only back at the client today, and unfortunately have not managed
to get that patch in yet.
(As I mentioned before, it's a production system)

However, I did notice something really odd.
I have focused my attention on the trends graphs, where I get all the
extra values, but it's not happening in the test itself, despite the
existence of the additional rrd files.

Example.
I have something that plots the power usage of the PSUs on a NetApp
e-series.
There are 4 PSUs, output looks like this.

Total power drawn- 487 Watts
Number of trays- 2
Tray power input details-

   TRAY ID  POWER SUPPLY SERIAL NUMBER   INPUT POWER
   99       0                            145 Watts
   99       1                            151 Watts
   0        0                            99 Watts
   0        1                            92 Watts

All good. And I have a graph with 4 lines. Min, Max, Curr and Avg values
are all there. It looks beautiful.
But go look at the power graph in trends, and it's ugly.
Heaps of additional data lines with no entries. All values are NaN
And mixed in amongst the additional empty graphs, are the 4 valid lines.

I look at the rrd files, and they are all there, even the bad ones.
Here's a few of them.
power,tcpListenDrop.rrd
power,tcpOutAck.rrd
power,tcpOutDataSegs.rrd
power,tcpOutRsts.rrd
power,tcpOutUrg.rrd
power,tcpOutWinProbe.rrd
power,tcpRetransSegs.rrd
power,tcpRtoMax.rrd
power,tcpRttUpdate.rrd
power,tcpTimKeepaliveProbe.rrd
power,tcpTimRetransDrop.rrd
power,Tray0_PSU0.rrd                  <--- Valid
power,Tray0_PSU1.rrd                  <--- Valid
power,Tray99_PSU0.rrd                 <--- Valid
power,Tray99_PSU1.rrd                 <--- Valid
power,trlogpool.rrd
power,UDP_udpInDatagrams.rrd
power,udpInCksumErrs.rrd
power,udpOutDatagrams.rrd
power,vnet.rrd

So I thought I would check my configs.
In xymonserver
From TEST2RRD= ,power=ncv,
From GRAPHS=  ,power::9,
And further down
SPLITNCV_power="*:GAUGE"

And in graphs.cfg
[power]
    FNPATTERN power,(.*).rrd
    TITLE Database Power Consumption Per Tray PSU
    YAXIS Watts
    -l 0
    DEF:p at RRDIDX@=@RRDFN@:lambda:AVERAGE
    LINE2:p at RRDIDX@#@COLOR@:@RRDPARAM@
    GPRINT:p at RRDIDX@:LAST: \: %5.1lf (cur)
    GPRINT:p at RRDIDX@:MAX: \: %5.1lf (max)
    GPRINT:p at RRDIDX@:MIN: \: %5.1lf (min)
    GPRINT:p at RRDIDX@:AVERAGE: \: %5.1lf (avg)\n

With luck I will get approval to recompile with the debugging bug-fix,
and we can get more info, but I thought the extra entries in trends, but
not in the test was interesting.

Regards
Vernon


On 13 March 2015 at 15:24, J.C. Cleaver <user-87556346d4af@xymon.invalid> wrote:
On Wed, March 11, 2015 5:51 pm, Jeremy Laidman wrote:
On 11 March 2015 at 14:18, Vernon Everett <user-b3f8dacb72c8@xymon.invalid>
wrote:
About now, I am getting a little nervous adding send and expect,
because
unlike telnet and telnets, we are doing ldap and ldaps testing.
That's understandable.  A read through the code suggests that at least
in
some places, an empty string is equivalent to an undefined string, as
the
string length (shown in Sendlen in the debug output) is zero in both
cases.  So until a patch is in place, a work-around might be to define
empty "send" and "expect" strings for those that have none.

Any suggestions?
I think we have some debug code update recommendations for JC though.
:-)
 Here's my patch.  I'll push this into the dev list for proposed
inclusion
in a future release.

--- lib/netservices.c.orig      2012-07-25 01:48:41.000000000 +1000
+++ lib/netservices.c   2015-03-12 11:18:18.000000000 +1100
@@ -328,9 +328,9 @@
        dbgprintf("Service list dump\n");
        for (i=0; (svcinfo[i].svcname); i++) {
                dbgprintf(" Name      : %s\n", svcinfo[i].svcname);
-               dbgprintf("   Sendtext: %s\n",
binview(svcinfo[i].sendtxt,
svcinfo[i].sendlen));
+               dbgprintf("   Sendtext: %s\n",
svcinfo[i].sendtxt!=NULL?binview(svcinfo[i].sendtxt,
svcinfo[i].sendlen):"[null]");
                dbgprintf("   Sendlen : %d\n", svcinfo[i].sendlen);
-               dbgprintf("   Exp.text: %s\n",
binview(svcinfo[i].exptext,
svcinfo[i].explen));
+               dbgprintf("   Exp.text: %s\n",
svcinfo[i].exptext!=NULL?binview(svcinfo[i].exptext,
svcinfo[i].explen):"[null]");
                dbgprintf("   Exp.len : %d\n", svcinfo[i].explen);
                dbgprintf("   Exp.ofs : %d\n", svcinfo[i].expofs);
                dbgprintf("   Flags   : %d\n", svcinfo[i].flags);

This produces "[null]" where we would have seen "(null)" on a GNU-based
OS,
to differentiate between the two situations.

In the mean time, you could compile a special version of xymond_rrd,
and
run it manually on the same data channel as the real one, but have it
make
RRD files and log file to a different location.  This shouldn't
interfere
with your production Xymon.  Here's one I prepared earlier that works
for
me:

sudo -u xymon mkdir /tmp/my-rrd-data/
sudo -u xymon xymoncmd /bin/sh -c 'XYMONTMP=/tmp;
/usr/lib/xymon/server/bin/xymond_channel --channel=data
--log=/tmp/my-rrd-data.log /path/to/xymond_rrd_debug_patch
--rrddir=/tmp/my-rrd-data/ --debug'

This seems to show some really useful stuff that's relevant to solving
your
problem.  Some sample debug lines:

15306 2015-03-12 11:36:28 xymond_rrd_debug_patch: Got message 165619
@@data#165619/servername|1426120588.401891|172.16.0.1||servername|vmstat|sunos|ABC
...
15306 2015-03-12 11:36:28 Creating rrd
/tmp/my-rrd-data//servername/vmstat.rrd
15306 2015-03-12 11:36:28 RRD create param 00: 'rrdcreate'
15306 2015-03-12 11:36:28 RRD create param 01:
'/tmp/my-rrd-data//servername/vmstat.rrd'
15306 2015-03-12 11:36:28 RRD create param 02: '-s'
15306 2015-03-12 11:36:28 RRD create param 03: '300'
15306 2015-03-12 11:36:28 RRD create param 04: 'DS:cpu_r:GAUGE:600:0:U'
15306 2015-03-12 11:36:28 RRD create param 05: 'DS:cpu_b:GAUGE:600:0:U'
15306 2015-03-12 11:36:28 RRD create param 06: 'DS:cpu_w:GAUGE:600:0:U'
...
15306 2015-03-12 11:39:42 Got 265 bytes
15306 2015-03-12 11:39:42 xymond_rrd_debug_patch: Got message 165737
@@data#165737/servername|1426120782.080244|172.16.0.2||servername|trends||DEF
15306 2015-03-12 11:39:42 startpos 216644, fillpos 216644, endpos -1
15306 2015-03-12 11:39:42 Flushing
'/servername/tcp.xopiy90404.parameter.rrd' with 1 updates pending,
template
'sec'
15306 2015-03-12 11:39:42 Want msg 165738, startpos 216644, fillpos
216644,
endpos -1, usedbytes=0, bufleft=1884603

J
This is some excellent sleuthing! :)

As I was pouring through the thread (sorry, I've been out the last few
days), I failed to take note of the SPARC-Enterprise-T2000 in the output.


The patch below should fix the immediate issue triggered by debug mode...
letting us move on to the larger oddness. Unfortunately, I have a feeling
there are other occasions where we're relying on GNU's printf(NULL)
printing that out and thus might be caught by this. As I find them, I go
ahead and work to put fixes in.

In the meantime, this will be in 4.3.19 and can be patched directly from
below.


HTH,

-jc


--- lib/netservices.c   (revision 7598)
+++ lib/netservices.c   (working copy)
@@ -81,9 +81,9 @@
        unsigned char *inp, *outp;
        int i;

-       if (!buf) return NULL;
+       if (result) xfree(result);
+       if (!buf) { result = strdup("[null]"); return result; }

-       if (result) xfree(result);
        if (buf && (buflen == 0)) buflen = strlen(buf);
        result = (char *)malloc(4*buflen + 1);  /* Worst case: All
binary */
--
"Accept the challenges so that you can feel the exhilaration of victory"
- General George Patton
-- 
"Accept the challenges so that you can feel the exhilaration of victory"
- General George Patton