Thanks much Jeremy!
That's what I wanted to confirm, if I customize the [disk] graph, then would we lose those default graphs vs. just adding the IO stats to the same [disk] graphs.
PS – I'm using devmon too, but just getting into it. It sounds like devmon may give you better/other IO stats vs making custom Xymon graphs for disk io from the OS information provided.
Regards,
Don K
From: Jeremy Laidman <user-71895fb2e44c@xymon.invalid<mailto:user-71895fb2e44c@xymon.invalid>>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 16:42:18 +1100
To: Don Kuhlman <user-5eb2bfadc6c6@xymon.invalid<mailto:user-5eb2bfadc6c6@xymon.invalid>>
Cc: Vernon Everett <user-b3f8dacb72c8@xymon.invalid<mailto:user-b3f8dacb72c8@xymon.invalid>>, Steve Holmes <user-ec1bf77b1b44@xymon.invalid<mailto:user-ec1bf77b1b44@xymon.invalid>>, "xymon at xymon.com<mailto:xymon at xymon.com>" <xymon at xymon.com<mailto:xymon at xymon.com>>
Subject: Re: [Xymon] diskstat.sh/RRD oddity
On 12 October 2012 03:51, Don Kuhlman <user-5eb2bfadc6c6@xymon.invalid<mailto:user-5eb2bfadc6c6@xymon.invalid>> wrote:
My question is – can we include these graphs in the "disk" column's graphs vs the trends column ?
Anything is possible.
If so, what's the best way to do that?
You could replace the graph.cfg entry for [disk] with one of the graph definitions provide with the script (eg [diskstat-reads]). But then you would lose existing graphs (if any) of disk space utilisation.
I want them both, so I have a separate "diskio" dot (actually fed in from devmon, but the principle is the same).
J