Xymon Mailing List Archive search

A couple of migration questions

list Ryan Novosielski
Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:33:06 -0500
Message-Id: <user-8033ce221a2a@xymon.invalid>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thanks. This is all helpful. I did the upgrade today and things are
pretty much back to working the way I want them to. Going forward I
should be able to take advantage of some of the new stuff and make
some of it more robust than my old setup.

On 12/10/2012 05:29 PM, Root, Paul wrote:
I do that to. Works pretty slick.

One thing we just ran into though was with bluesync. We’d get a
feedback loop and the disabled tests wouldn’t stay disabled.

We decided to upgrade to 4.3.10 and use the built in
xymond_distribute.

Unfortunately, that didn’t help. The same problem persisted. Then
I figured out that we should send to xymond not the proxy. That
solved the problem.

*From:*xymon-bounces at xymon.com [mailto:xymon-bounces at xymon.com]
*On Behalf Of *Larry Barber *Sent:* Monday, December 10, 2012 2:10
PM *To:* Novosielski, Ryan *Cc:* xymon >> xymon at xymon.com *Subject:* Re: [Xymon] A couple of migration questions


There's no problem with having xymonproxy and xymond running on the
same machine, you just need to change the port that one of them
listens on. It's usually easier to change xymond's port. I have run
several servers with xymonproxy running "on top" of xymond, where
the xymonproxy instance would forward to both another port on the
machine it was running on (usually 1985) and to another machine
that was running a backup instance of xymon or a test instance.


Thanks, Larry Barber

On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Novosielski, Ryan
<user-ae4522577e16@xymon.invalid <mailto:user-ae4522577e16@xymon.invalid>> wrote:

On 12/09/2012 06:53 PM, Jeremy Laidman wrote:
On 7 December 2012 06:57, Novosielski, Ryan <user-ae4522577e16@xymon.invalid
<mailto:user-ae4522577e16@xymon.invalid <mailto:user-ae4522577e16@xymon.invalid>>> wrote:
1) Do the xymonnet machines listen on the Xymon port? They seem to, but I can't see any reason why they should. If they didn't, I'd configure the xymonnet machines to use the standard port
1984 to give me less to do when going live.
I agree, the xymonnet process should not be listening on any
port. Only the xymond process listens on port 1984.
Well, tracked this one down! Most things have "NEEDS xymond" and
at one point I thought that mattered and didn't disable xymond.
It's been running for no reason on my setup apparently since the
beginning.

- -- - ---- _  _ _  _ ___  _  _  _
|Y#| |  | |\/| |  \ |\ |  | |Ryan Novosielski - Sr. Systems Programmer
|$&| |__| |  | |__/ | \| _| |user-ae4522577e16@xymon.invalid - 973/972.0922 (2-0922)
\__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent.|IST/EI-Academic Svcs. - ADMC 450, Newark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlDGYyIACgkQmb+gadEcsb5LOgCfTT/4Qd1c8zUEnK2idbCLyxiC
BSwAoIz5uczxJ02w0eTqwx941xcs/mNR
=ePZX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----