We're just running the NT client, I have enough trouble getting the NT
admins to just install that, let alone anything else. It probably is the
memory size that's causing problems. Here's a sample of the return from
the cpu test:
Tue Jul 19 14:44:37 CDT 2005 [ANANKE] up: 83 days, 1 users, 40 procs,
load=1%, PhysicalMem: 3840MB(23%)
Memory Statistics
Total Physical memory: 4025925632 bytes (3.75GB)
Available Physical memory: 3102130176 bytes (2.89GB)
Total PageFile size: 4294967295 bytes (4.00GB)
Available PageFile size: 4294967295 bytes (4.00GB)
Total Virtual memory size: 2147352576 bytes (2.00GB)
Available Virtual memory size: 2119045120 bytes (1.97GB)
Most active processes
00.81% tomcat5 (0x190 [400])
00.03% System (0x4 [4])
00.02% winlogon (0x2ac [684])
00.02% Rtvscan (0x8a8 [2216])
00.00% VxSvc (0x918 [2328])
00.00% svchost (0x444 [1092])
00.00% StarbaseServer (0x13d0 [5072])
00.00% sqlservr (0x608 [1544])
00.00% csrss (0x294 [660])
Thanks,
Larry Barber
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 14:42 -0500, user-ce4a2c883f75@xymon.invalid wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 03:28:29PM -0400, user-7a6c75d6cc10@xymon.invalid
wrote: > I just noticed that all the memory trending graphs for Windows
machines > are broken. They just show zero's all across the board. Is this a
known > problem, or is something broken in my setup?
Do you have the bb-memory extension installed on your Windows boxes, or just the BBNT client ?
If you dont know - is there a "memory" column for these boxes, or only the "cpu" column ? bb-memory generates a "memory" column, the standard BBNT client does not.
I suspect it's the BBNT client that is feeding your memory graphs. It has some problems with large-memory systems, but it could also be a bug in Hobbit. Please send me the output from the "cpu" status on one of these boxes.
Regards, Henrik