On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Olivier Beau <user-eb340192b6fc@xymon.invalid> wrote:
Xymon is just one part of the equation for me. I see a lot of potential
for Xymon in the Windows world but the BBWin client is well a very quiet
project as well. I am not sure yet if we would maybe fork the code or create
a new client. At this point I would suggest that maybe we look at a Java
based client for xymon so we can run on a huge variety of platforms with one
client. Anyway the whole client is a whole different ball game.
i talked with Eric Grignon (a friend a mine) a couple weeks ago, he dropped
bbwin's development and will not go back to it.
-> you can consider bbwin "dead"
All, hope you don't mind the long threads contain different subjects
around "dead" xymon.
let me know if we new to start a new thread on the subject of BBWin.
Olivier,
Thanks for the good inside information.
No problem to take a break or even dropping BBWin development by
original author. All I am asking is like what we do at work.
Submit your resignation and transfer your responsibility to next person.
I was able to compile Mr. Big using cross-compiler but BBWin is still
currently more feature complete than Mr. Big.
See my post in R1, I am hoping we can work together to come up with a
working BBWin development machine and publish the procedure again so
others can take over BBWin development if need to.
tj
R1: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=user-0294f3294763@xymon.invalid&forum_name=hobbitmon-developer
olivier
ps: i'll ask him to confirm this to the list
--
T.J. Yang