On Friday 02 July 2010, TJ Yang wrote:
Hi, Tom
Hope you don't mind I changed the subject and cc to
hobbitmon-developer on this topic.
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Tom Georgoulias
<user-6a0b8b0f0ae1@xymon.invalid> wrote:
On 07/02/2010 05:47 AM, Neil Franken wrote:
Xymon is just one part of the equation for me. I see a lot of
potential for Xymon in the Windows world but the BBWin client is well
a very quiet project as well. I am not sure yet if we would maybe
fork the code or create a new client. At this point I would suggest
that maybe we look at a Java based client for xymon so we can run on
a huge variety of platforms with one client. Anyway the whole client
is a whole different ball game.
I would not be in favor of a java based client, the current design is
much better on unix systems. It's one of the reasons xymon works well.
Indeed. I vote against a java based client.
Xymon is fast and light. Java is bloaded and slow. (I know people will say java can be small and fast, but I never found a fast and small java application).
Me, as a sysadmin will not allow a java environment installed just for running a basic monitoring client if that client is now a simple shell script and a simple C program.
I can understand the need for a java client for the more uncommon OS'es, but don't make it the only available client for linux / unix / windows.
I do have concerns about hobbitclient-OS??.sh shell script's programming
style. There is no check return status of system command it call and there
is no error handling when system command faild.
I got many purple alert when one of the system command failed or
didn't finish in time.
That's easy to solve. Just update the scripts and add some error trapping. I can do that if needed. But I never had the need because I never had a purple alert because some system command gave an error.
Stef