Well, among other things, I'd be a bit happier about the client myself
if the company name weren't so prominently mis-spelled in the past two
releases. I'm assuming that 'UEST' in this header is really supposed to
be 'QUEST': Wed Dec 28 12:01:19 UEST 2005.
Leads me to wonder a bit myself about the Q/C on the rest of the code.
Tom
-----Original Message-----
From: PAUL WILLIAMSON [mailto:user-b9fa55f5c833@xymon.invalid] Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 10:53 AM
To: user-ae9b8668bcde@xymon.invalid
Subject: Re: [hobbit] Anyone working on an NT client?
user-3feba9e60a8b@xymon.invalid 12/28/05 10:30 AM >>>
I'm interested.
I currently run the BB/Quest bbnt client, but my NT admins would feel a whole lot better about installing it if we had the source.
Why? Do you have the source to Windows NT? How about to Exchange or SAP? I know, maybe Larry will give you the source to Oracle...
I don't get why having the source is of any consequence...
Paul